IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP WG Interim June 2023 planning: draft-ietf-dnsop rfc8499bis and lame delegation

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Tue, 30 May 2023 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B961C15C524 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71tUSKrA-EOo for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dane.soverin.net (dane.soverin.net [IPv6:2a10:de80:1:4091:b9e9:2219:0:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C678AC159A24 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QVxFm495WzySY for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 15:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QVxFm22tSzVL for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 15:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1685460700; bh=SBpVUhQn21PseXHYWegbxXFqoRhcVIET6q3qeOozCEU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=k73bN6zuS+efWd2iASzBIYChA4URTVqEkufVOTbX23F7n7zGc2AhhLmQp5G2yRo+/ qc8j6U0gUit/TgeTLIMtzxEo3MivC0DkiZXxKqb9HkbJNWm0KmhPBo6eiLacggulvC AkWPGvUpHg7hmFNLt82GTCqgHPy63VFdlKIs5StlRZUUUZhQLyI5kjAKwLyrT50BBL ZM/S+8UPcMbRvTVMfsq2DrlvTHsmp28rjVq7Nu48ejQSw4FKD74SG8U0W9WThIWqsF 2f/rj0v/ioIwE2FIM0cowDHTkvXdlJ4+mbqglY6KHo7vXryPbGxwmnm7e92XDISgx4 i6qGnlkYqVRzA==
Message-ID: <08728d67-0c94-205e-bcbc-3f9cb17d45d0@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 17:31:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <54bad8e8-b1ea-9d63-a436-da9c6552ee63@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Soverin-Authenticated: true
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <54bad8e8-b1ea-9d63-a436-da9c6552ee63@NLnetLabs.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/K2rbkbnENMOpwc6bISaWAPldHQ0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP WG Interim June 2023 planning: draft-ietf-dnsop rfc8499bis and lame delegation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:32:33 -0000

Hi WG,

Gentle reminder to fill in the doodle to schedule the interim in June.

Will extend the poll until Thursday, June 1!


-- Benno


On 24/05/2023 16:11, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> Dear WG,
> 
> As mentioned earlier on the mailing list, the chairs are planning an 
> interim meeting in June to discuss the three options on how to proceed 
> with draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis wrt. lame delegation:
> 
> 1) Stick with the current text in the document – the original definition 
> from RFC8499 plus a note that "These early definitions do not match the 
> current use of the term "lame delegation", but there is no consensus on 
> what a lame delegation is."
> A possible follow-up to this is for someone to start a WG consensus 
> document on "lame", which can update 8499bis.
> 2) We still find a rough consensus on the definition proposed in the 
> "Meaning of lame delegation" email thread, and the WG can agree that 
> this is a definition useful to DNS engineers/operators.
> 3) Withdraw the document from WGLC so we can add definitions.  Do not 
> propose any new terms and definitions at this stage if we choose this 
> option.
> 
> 
> Please fill in the Doodle poll to settle on a day and time:
> 
> - https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/az7Z5AOb
> 
> The options for the time slots are a compromise for CEST/EDT/PDT/AEST/JST.
> 
> We will close the Doodle poll at the end of Tuesday 30 May.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Suzanne, Tim and Benno
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email