Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

... and fixed - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
Thank you all.
W

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:55 AM Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:45 AM Andrew McConachie <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to
> > [e-mail] asking them to open a bug.
> >
>
> ... and I jsut saw this mail after sending mail to the secretariat --
> this is now well covered :-)
> W
>
> > I believe this errata can be closed.
> >
> > --Andrew
> >
> > On 8/9/19 11:10, John Dickinson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying Updated by RFC7766 but the document does not say that.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > John
> > >
> > > On 9 Aug 2019, at 9:47, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > >
> > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
> > >> "DNS Stateful Operations".
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> You may review the report below and at:
> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5804
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> Type: Editorial
> > >> Reported by: Andrew McConachie <[e-mail]>
> > >>
> > >> Section: GLOBAL
> > >>
> > >> Original Text
> > >> -------------
> > >> RFC8490 states that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
> > >>
> > >> Corrected Text
> > >> --------------
> > >> I believe RFC8490 is not updated by RFC7766.
> > >>
> > >> Notes
> > >> -----
> > >> I'm not sure if this actually errata, but it should be fixed regardless. The data tracker page for RFC8490 state that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
> > >>
> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8490
> > >>
> > >> Instructions:
> > >> -------------
> > >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> RFC8490 (draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-20)
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> Title               : DNS Stateful Operations
> > >> Publication Date    : March 2019
> > >> Author(s)           : R. Bellis, S. Cheshire, J. Dickinson, S. Dickinson, T. Lemon, T. Pusateri
> > >> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > >> Source              : Domain Name System Operations
> > >> Area                : Operations and Management
> > >> Stream              : IETF
> > >> Verifying Party     : IESG
> > >
> > > John Dickinson
> > >
> > > https://sinodun.com
> > >
> > > Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
> > > Magdalen Centre
> > > Oxford Science Park
> > > Robert Robinson Avenue
> > > Oxford OX4 4GA
> > > U.K.
> >
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf