Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 09 August 2019 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6116C12002E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdT_Inivv7Rd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B52A120019 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id g18so978097qkl.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZTVwCYSCCLRiLgQnDyeqSBEEWOZhG8zaUv+4hDakitw=; b=XoKFowqfRqoFXIyu79kawdRlsj14fNcUMTiBtFlRQRobjUe1ldgOFDaxSMmD+uI9I7 8HsmnjLmK5fW057sNnd6iYfpYXrZe/AtVLZJuDTziJ+IlRJjXT/0BC8+YGSOps37H3cc yevpkjDU3PCKTi2zBWmV0OzlMJfE7qVOEQQxx+i/8Pejtw7xX2Iy715BA16Do2/sD0N7 IpiWiRuJ1XqKQoxyqp1Dzf/mSp7bSm1KN2w48GRdoqHnH0+qLdbvZyVA5FgnzxzkPh5b A59Hb/77Qeaa+x/qcl1iGnltpR8PONbfuu9/f/BhHzakZTyETTpUMFGiuvaEJj1jI26N piXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZTVwCYSCCLRiLgQnDyeqSBEEWOZhG8zaUv+4hDakitw=; b=FlEGIAF9OAE8gjaLYeFrW+paF7/ekw5X0UiLxEXqstB7wYv2MA1s6BKJXqZaxm81VP ZLw3P7cZTGdoWiYmBuA/H8tM/psMpzNzEAUYo60B13DWynm6wh7h8eGTNfKUgT3vaxci ehtARDrH+20r+Pf4WuP2bP1O1YVXr/sKS1Nm4dKu5G589Y0MvvjJh0Pi2TpvcZQAQKu5 y8hdDyQRiw03Wsuu+JXbnodMfwRof3soOeRkvJkSyrHE1u2W4ngnfEM+icJ3JD7h+x/X GSDxBhVCsCCbcOvbglKjiGYRpSDOWPggus11xLz5+TYtSMh54ceWH137VQs5tsrBbF4X FDYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9JWNaCrnP60FUqIAFwpRajsx7A77TpFrKqGXlD+I4X5eIl8B+ ouVImmG4S3jCGCtUcQznbwjKv1TJkWqkyQ8WnH3jXQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwIY1+t1Vyo+oqtWSFhyOKMnwhbZ8DYge/1GUD/mnUdrGyn7jTQbOuKp8eAw9/6Q2YubbaKrtkjFtAfGb44iiM=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4acd:: with SMTP id x196mr6914470qka.192.1565371995673; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190809084729.4A3CDB80B92@rfc-editor.org> <BDCD75E6-32A7-4E4A-A00A-1261FC2E9519@sinodun.com> <5cbcd020-2a32-ea61-998e-d098641cbfeb@depht.com> <CAHw9_iLh-5+zDCdS=+9azPAEQ3ppNmSVMsk95ePOEH+YW==_SQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLh-5+zDCdS=+9azPAEQ3ppNmSVMsk95ePOEH+YW==_SQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:32:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ+z18k+EMLa8p3re4mkCghs49bZ=d7XTr6Q_TBL3keUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
Cc: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KA0asLaZE0KVJwzE5W3N4EU1DQQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:33:20 -0000

... and fixed - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
Thank you all.
W

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:55 AM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:45 AM Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com> wrote:
> >
> > This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to
> > datatracker-project@ietf.org asking them to open a bug.
> >
>
> ... and I jsut saw this mail after sending mail to the secretariat --
> this is now well covered :-)
> W
>
> > I believe this errata can be closed.
> >
> > --Andrew
> >
> > On 8/9/19 11:10, John Dickinson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying Updated by RFC7766 but the document does not say that.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > John
> > >
> > > On 9 Aug 2019, at 9:47, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > >
> > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
> > >> "DNS Stateful Operations".
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> You may review the report below and at:
> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5804
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> Type: Editorial
> > >> Reported by: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
> > >>
> > >> Section: GLOBAL
> > >>
> > >> Original Text
> > >> -------------
> > >> RFC8490 states that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
> > >>
> > >> Corrected Text
> > >> --------------
> > >> I believe RFC8490 is not updated by RFC7766.
> > >>
> > >> Notes
> > >> -----
> > >> I'm not sure if this actually errata, but it should be fixed regardless. The data tracker page for RFC8490 state that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
> > >>
> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8490
> > >>
> > >> Instructions:
> > >> -------------
> > >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> RFC8490 (draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-20)
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >> Title               : DNS Stateful Operations
> > >> Publication Date    : March 2019
> > >> Author(s)           : R. Bellis, S. Cheshire, J. Dickinson, S. Dickinson, T. Lemon, T. Pusateri
> > >> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > >> Source              : Domain Name System Operations
> > >> Area                : Operations and Management
> > >> Stream              : IETF
> > >> Verifying Party     : IESG
> > >
> > > John Dickinson
> > >
> > > https://sinodun.com
> > >
> > > Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
> > > Magdalen Centre
> > > Oxford Science Park
> > > Robert Robinson Avenue
> > > Oxford OX4 4GA
> > > U.K.
> >
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf