IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35681314CF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdTLZMgu3you for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B481314D1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C0C242125A; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn0=bGKom=fJ9C7Y3ChCgH5H+nZ-nKJjMyTFLAc1_1xC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:51:14 +0000
Cc: IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41C6CA57-0D7B-464E-B7FF-057D295BDE00@rfc1035.com>
References: <1E14B142-680B-4E30-809B-68E03EB6E326@gmail.com> <6DDEFD26-A6ED-4E26-B5C0-1D1EEFFD509A@vpnc.org> <CAKr6gn0=bGKom=fJ9C7Y3ChCgH5H+nZ-nKJjMyTFLAc1_1xC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KAXpcgnOD16EaWTQZxSsTl-1De4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:51:29 -0000

> On 20 Mar 2017, at 04:06, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
> 
> Where's the measurement of existing use?

I'll be happy to plough through the 2016 DITL dataset and count TLD strings of interest. What ones would the WG like me to count?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email