Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35681314CF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdTLZMgu3you for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B481314D1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C0C242125A; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn0=bGKom=fJ9C7Y3ChCgH5H+nZ-nKJjMyTFLAc1_1xC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:51:14 +0000
Cc: IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41C6CA57-0D7B-464E-B7FF-057D295BDE00@rfc1035.com>
References: <1E14B142-680B-4E30-809B-68E03EB6E326@gmail.com> <6DDEFD26-A6ED-4E26-B5C0-1D1EEFFD509A@vpnc.org> <CAKr6gn0=bGKom=fJ9C7Y3ChCgH5H+nZ-nKJjMyTFLAc1_1xC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KAXpcgnOD16EaWTQZxSsTl-1De4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:51:29 -0000

> On 20 Mar 2017, at 04:06, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
> 
> Where's the measurement of existing use?

I'll be happy to plough through the 2016 DITL dataset and count TLD strings of interest. What ones would the WG like me to count?