IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-00.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 15 November 2017 04:07 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49237124217 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNBwomgeRmse for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A258126CBF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.170.78.140] (unknown [65.158.49.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F29961FA2; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:07:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5A0BBD7C.1000307@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:24 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.20 (Windows/20171012)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <150940017764.7814.6739838599217498076@ietfa.amsl.com> <23040.33307.69754.133713@gro.dd.org> <23050.45832.787089.325014@gro.dd.org> <CA+nkc8B1sVhjbn1xYu4rQNgUZGgeaqnVjW=U0nmpRdu6rvXU2Q@mail.gmail.com> <23051.40720.908131.277454@gro.dd.org> <CAHXf=0oQTVe3LFdkGLYH0XL4Vg1Fm5JdnOaOCJ59zwiMkk6MVw@mail.gmail.com> <1a020200-3e7d-47a2-bd63-b745fceb7958@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1a020200-3e7d-47a2-bd63-b745fceb7958@bellis.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KETU9Q0at6J_2DOCybMmUiEM0G4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:07:28 -0000


Ray Bellis wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm not particularly arguing either way on this question of signalling,
> but do we have any feel for how many stubs ever send EDNS?
>
> libresolv can do it, and getdns does, but I don't think glibc's resolver
> routinely sends EDNS.

i would look to opendns or gdns for those stats. they've got to be 
seeing an excellent cross-section of every possible stub implementation.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email