Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 11 November 2015 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1529E1A893B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:19:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hReXsSRjouHD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261831A8896 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 03:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC1C41FCAB2; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA7F160067; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE3016007E; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id vjIoHSiEvRwV; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c122-106-161-187.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.161.187]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06FA4160067; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE073C86023; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:58 +1100 (EST)
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20151105235402.39FFC3BF2F29@rock.dv.isc.org> <20151110152511.6f1a1c20@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <20151111104833.GB29290@sources.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:48:33 +0100." <20151111104833.GB29290@sources.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:58 +1100
Message-Id: <20151111111858.DBE073C86023@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KFzV23fJX0oREb9iblPeXK-4ndA>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:13 -0000

In message <20151111104833.GB29290@sources.org>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:25:11PM +0100,
>  Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote 
>  a message of 49 lines which said:
> 
> > My guess is that part of the resistance is because you are going to
> > be asking people to spend money on something that does not provide
> > them or their customers any (direct) benefits. Further, it breaks
> > the registry-registrar model in some cases, where registries are
> > kept away from registrants by a 1.6 km-high wall.
> 
> +1 && +1
> 
> We at AFNIC have a long experience here since, during many years, we
> requested successful technical checks before registering a domain (at
> this time, there was no registration without delegation). It annoyed
> people a lot and we got a reputation of pain-in-the-ass stupid french
> people, always insisting on local and anti-american requirments (see
> <http://www.circleid.com/posts/afnic_dns_server_redelegation/> for a
> good example).
> 
> I'm not eager to try it again, unless people pledge to support us
> during flames on social networks.

Part of writing the I-D and trying to consensus through DNSOP rather
than going as a I-S is to provide the a backstop for registries
that check.  The more registries that check the better for everyone.
Support in numbers.


-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org