Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-02.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 31 March 2017 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64F9129435 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fOYk1etqKgaY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31FE2129A20 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 3B1EC31C7D; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA8F9EC0B59; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:52:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:52:17 -0500
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170331155217.GA19647@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <149080054550.26806.17675916795295413492@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <149080054550.26806.17675916795295413492@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KHFajTZwVRPBEf45xBgMDRb92gA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:53:32 -0000

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:15:45AM -0700,
 internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 43 lines which said:

>         Title           : DNS Scoped Data Through Global '_Underscore' Naming of Attribute Leaves
>         Author          : Dave Crocker
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-02.txt

Section 5 "IANA considerations" does not use the names of standard
policies. draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis, currently in the RFC editor
queue, says "It is not strictly required that documents use these
terms [the standard policies]; the actual requirement is that the
instructions to IANA be clear and unambiguous.  However, use of these
terms is strongly recommended because their meanings are widely
understood."

Therefore, I suggest to replace "have been specified in any published
RFC, or are documented by a specification published by another
standards organization" by "specification required (RFC 5226bis,
section 4.6).

Also, the proposed initial registry includes:

 SPF        | _spf         | "TXT" | [RFC7372]

RFC 7372 contains *nothing* about that, and SPF (RFC 7208) does not
use undesrscore names.