Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: (with COMMENT)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 21 November 2018 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14C5127598; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:42:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id svt8qcy34Edu; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C672127B92; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:42:41 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:42:40 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUgT8yxbvydyYtXUiwDLNMZZdiqqVaC1qA
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 02:42:39 +0000
Message-ID: <E351BE3A-9B45-43E2-9B69-5F849CEEDA87@icann.org>
References: <154276614451.29753.3535998981795767703.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154276614451.29753.3535998981795767703.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_145EABB2-6DC1-4521-811C-EFB507BC3202"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KIYrMuR_ccA_np_pPSr_yE4BLUE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 02:42:45 -0000

On Nov 20, 2018, at 6:09 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> §5:
> 
>> o  CBOR is an IETF standard and familiar to IETF participants.  It is
> 
> While CBOR is standards-track, it's nowhere near standard yet. Suggest:
> "...is an IETF specification..." (See BCP 9)

The CBOR WG is actively working on moving CBOR to Internet Standard, so "nowhere near" feels overstated. If you are trying to get the wording in this draft correct by BCP 9, the correction should be to "... is a Proposed Standard...".

--Paul Hoffman (who still finds it weird to be the co-author of CBOR)