Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 06 September 2017 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BED1132FC0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 07:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m0SmqAco4UJK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3067B132C2B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b23so19907367qkg.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=h018JThKRNq/G5VpXYWSLt8FZVlitvX1r2Edx2wcAZw=; b=aKIu05J9XPYc4RTYMs9lKGr53+duxSJ08ueIcUp+zU3xwkOYFtXTckP6uc5mipgP/2 908jZijFSUryFrIKbmydv++FX8ygm8VlWl1FZnJM9iTIoVWucxOSEScaCzCj8vfs4Hj4 UFLtf4dzKkCn47bhHH0DSd8NhOulaRNoob8Xpmr7gG1CZ9wP2MCuIAVmffyxZ3yyC9NS 7lLt3ZJg4THQKwAnPHDut1V8KMyusXHuoMshOX+O4Z8rzFqlvNmAA06kLuiDdtLHtOzV wn+dAGffyyaaF1ERWSG2Wq637AbIp9gC6P/eiiIdm0Lz9lImjICFW6fSugAXK7KN4i85 dI4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=h018JThKRNq/G5VpXYWSLt8FZVlitvX1r2Edx2wcAZw=; b=JChfalb2i5iKBHaT4dSHZrys7FIK4XQphWsKsuZzjAL1JPuP9b+VtypaKRzc2F4l2o n86ALw3dotc+0ry0Byo1wZGYnndkGgRBRUeSrh1/RSVt+jhJEWG3fFFpCxPO2S9zmxw/ 2Y0HWZRFp5hJCHQHDRNfCW0PiX+pvgkpl+PWcngLl84uukQ0vdjdhhr2WWrpkMeTEzuB 7bTmpmUeEDrjPFElVxcKu2ciMFhQFMuT/CABltgHVVOh/uUZWP467oI0sgfmCs+vRLLT 2tuoP2NPM46ConHw3zdOSrbKzqhqs39KeZyC6QntFBPKnxDZsW3HHvHrSXzuoDxy/S6g zc1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgMhwt0C640+DFJ+1N3Ckhh39/O8KiSXUZcZ7yYlnIrXUEBSbcf FYXiq9oW8uFNtoEfzMI7gw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5q7F3UUuIi4+NAqZeG9mB9CHvpbUbT1nu6N1MPDiMplNH0xjzoheYMKg5e+rgnI0F7Ko2hyw==
X-Received: by 10.55.166.73 with SMTP id p70mr3545235qke.342.1504708550250; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cavall.ether.lede.home (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u64sm2236184qkc.68.2017.09.06.07.35.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <93C3A47F-07C4-443F-AB87-B5C29F6B6774@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FB6AD6D3-C9C3-4CD6-BD5D-702226EA7086"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:35:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Ex23QVef3AegWB4Jgd-sjG-G4z7XmXL9guN8PeWtsssw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+EZQY9i5-4Ce-NZykwC+sS6iY868Wg0crW6KAZTGQxFQg@mail.gmail.com> <24CD1C88-58C5-4D6C-9F00-E3A2CD8C657C@fugue.com> <CADyWQ+Ex23QVef3AegWB4Jgd-sjG-G4z7XmXL9guN8PeWtsssw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KKcRktXCcRg6lXksFiV-65Dc0MA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:35:52 -0000

On Sep 6, 2017, at 10:33 AM, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.  The document still waffles, but it 'waffles less' than it did initially.  But Mike is committed to working that and any other issue which may arise. 

The question I really have is not whether Mike is willing—he's stated that he is.   It's whether the working group is willing, since returning NXDOMAIN is an actual change in behavior from the original specification in RFC 6761, and will likely result in some breakage, since it can safely be assumed that some stacks are currently following the RFC6761 advice.