Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Tue, 01 March 2016 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C81B2FE5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:01:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9a01Ohz15bRb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:01:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02BE1B2FF3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:00:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.87] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u21H0Zei025847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:00:35 -0800
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20160301163905.71179.qmail@ary.lan> <56D5C767.4010603@bellis.me.uk>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <56D5CAA6.7030100@bbiw.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 09:00:22 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56D5C767.4010603@bellis.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 01 Mar 2016 09:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KQ5hY0LkiA9D4M1yokbb-Fdlc64>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:01:51 -0000


On 3/1/2016 8:46 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
> I'd suggest that perhaps the keywords from the protocol registry (or a
> canonical representation thereof, for those that don't match LDH) should
> actually be reserved ?

yeah, that makes sense.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net