Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Mon, 17 February 2014 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F5A1A0520 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:44:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmNvCVMg3qWJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org (alpha.virtualized.org [199.233.229.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1551A0554 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8404284B42; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:44:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha.virtualized.org [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02095-05; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:44:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-67-169-100-133.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.100.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc@virtualized.org) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9739D8445C; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:44:26 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E5B8C5C1-330A-4758-B12A-3E9E983AE60A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <DDBEF38A-CEA1-4816-BD2E-931AA2728A9B@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:44:24 -0800
Message-Id: <142F23D3-9EB9-451D-B7EF-AE1B7E104DF1@virtualized.org>
References: <52FEF407.30405@redbarn.org> <20140215140133.GA6990@sources.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca> <D82F49E8-9A06-4F52-8E3E-DF5C8D0B7549@virtualized.org> <53006595.5010207@frobbit.se> <5300C10A.8010308@dcrocker.net> <5300C52A.9050802@frobbit.se> <5300E26B.4030301@dcrocker.net> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402161123090.27242@bofh.nohats.ca> <951E7F4B-81AC-43BB-B878-4266C5E00373@nominum.com> <20140217164408.GC27215@mx1.yitter.info> <9D53CD2A-B443-468B-9EB6-B934728DAF25@nominum.com> <915BC55A-FCB2-4C7D-AABA-E8BE8018D4CF@virtualized.org> <DDBEF38A-CEA1-4816-BD2E-931AA2728A9B@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KesHryvYNPdskg1vaur8ahYZ9FU
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:44:32 -0000

On Feb 17, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>; wrote:
> However, creating working groups is a pretty heavyweight process

Perhaps this is the problem that should be solved?

> Possibly rotating working group chairs more frequently would work in such cases.

This seems to imply the working group chairs have a larger role than I suspect is healthy (either for the WG chairs or the IETF as a whole).

Regards,
-drc