Re: [DNSOP] RFC 1035 vs. mandatory NS at apex?

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org> Thu, 07 February 2019 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@mukund.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B57126D00 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:06:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tosl7I59CrA4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.banu.com (mail.banu.com [188.40.18.99]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A6212008F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jurassic.lan.banu.com (unknown [27.5.235.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.banu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8B925A40C3C; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:06:55 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 21:36:52 +0530
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>
To: Petr =?utf-8?B?xaBwYcSNZWs=?= <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190207160652.GA26069@jurassic.lan.banu.com>
References: <fcd790a2-414b-491e-01e2-9aa92f7b1c4e@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <fcd790a2-414b-491e-01e2-9aa92f7b1c4e@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KiYo7hXdj0Jsv4MoKoEuSCyiPEI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 1035 vs. mandatory NS at apex?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:06:59 -0000

On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 01:16:01PM +0100, Petr Špaček wrote:
> Is it mandatory or not? Should I submit erratum for RFC 1035?

Please do so. If something that's widely accepted is not clearly stated,
documenting it would be helpful both to implementors and also to point
as reference when checking for correctness.

		Mukund