Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 30 April 2020 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4B3A0A1E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbGODydbz0WD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1A43A0A1B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (vixp1.redbarn.org [24.104.150.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67971B074A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:21:38 +0000
Message-ID: <13695633.MBjBmyXxC4@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdXABaLnQaucBtpnjjxuhoxzyDMatEXy5wR=NuyWR3ac6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHPuVdV9eSCLQOqMF0cq8fHcuSZs7nCgjhHMfMoaV5H=ekbtSA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdU39Qcg+qDLdqidq5T8f=bH2i-SLEEQ1DRe0M--Sbi21Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdXABaLnQaucBtpnjjxuhoxzyDMatEXy5wR=NuyWR3ac6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KkRqfk5LJXGphH5Ozb17JFGPFEM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:21:41 -0000

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 15:54:33 UTC Shumon Huque wrote:
> to the list, after Paul Wouters replied to me privately.
> 
> I realize now this was Paul W responding to Paul V. I thought in
> my response below I was replying again to Paul V!

ah. too many pauls, as before. nevertheless i agreed with your reply:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:45 AM Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > Nope, I'm fully aware of all the non-technical issues and resistance (and
> > have described some of that in the article). But there were a small
> > contingent of web folks that were interested in DANE, and that might
> > have been enough to gain an initial foothold there.
> > You have to start somewhere.

+1.

-- 
Paul