IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] IANA Policy for SVCB

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Tue, 22 March 2022 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6073A0121 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=portfast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8wbwqRzUrOPA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.portfast.net (mail.portfast.net [IPv6:2a03:9800:20:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421BB3A0687 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=portfast.net; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XU51M/inir0K4Ne+wxVSIQhQ37JJCj4feiwwzviDb70=; b=PeyVYFSsGxbcZb1tME7YjXHDzo uNd8sxMjkABFQceEjIfBvt69hrK47j7gZWzRtjYp1h34VlJmvwT6BUGr2/xZZHAa5n/55K8t1PP6s 9BsYVGk9e+HYku9gY5yYcnY3KOEg3nJUCpBlwXi5blStEs3ySBr9hyshLraBxWreJ/WQ=;
Received: from [213.18.129.171] (port=61804 helo=[10.1.2.70]) by mail.portfast.net ([188.246.200.9]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1nWh4t-00066D-2G (Exim 4.92) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:09:47 +0000
Message-ID: <79e252e5-6aae-5dca-2d49-3ee6aa85f558@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:09:46 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHbrMsB5Lhm+cUoEzXwwKn74pBCrAOB+wnJG8ATscxkh7zSvLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY11Z32q2+Co1Gsn=t7mgZOT6gfx6saXuNQTJ8nhK4nvg@mail.gmail.com> <66256ce9-bb9f-4534-87ff-c589566db395@www.fastmail.com> <CAL0qLwaXuXA9SC4vv8wJ025mSwgq0ontC7ACVFo_APE-fWbN-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaXuXA9SC4vv8wJ025mSwgq0ontC7ACVFo_APE-fWbN-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KuBOCgNaTm8YZW0wC1CzLBxKKU0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IANA Policy for SVCB
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:09:55 -0000


On 22/03/2022 16:01, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> As to the options proposed, I agree that Expert Review can introduce 
> delay, but given the above, so too can Specification Required (maybe 
> worse, in aggregate).  So I recommend Expert Review.

I am concerned that the set of Expert Reviewers necessary to handle SVCB 
needs to have both expert DNS experience *and* detailed knowledge of the 
SVCB model for this to work.

I am not sure there's anybody who fits that criteria.

Ray [RRTYPE expert reviewer]

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status