IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with COMMENT)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8EC130FA3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4FdGwQvoyEw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72296130F2B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p81-v6so7398683itp.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bhqmEEFLLJvqKMMUA4mchTx3MeNZuR2/afDDIdZkb3k=; b=MKdvUDDYo4sd2FHZ4TlVeO6Fgu+tZ6apApqcNPoPqJ8F/75CEwXz1g5FTotC+1/R5Z LCRbvpH9IY8Da0n1uf9EIqISJbLqP1JD/mtCaNxgd0AkYv77O5kiNP6AAJg4RoSeYvUT UYOeeg8+1zHATSlGapggtc7pvRW+wSBAtVhkgN5cxFI2jxTqeGHoSyfxCxEKLh/A1BRW gfY3pQAsIXWoxrPBhWzvYcGJJVDIgLtQya0OrkTNqrSnhs2/5i33AZKOR5lUiVXVrKJR xtlb16n+P+fVyDBBZ0eCMlB/qPGOBp9q1QsCvA7vjBIgwHgoF6vn/2FcwCl1EvW2qB9A Q8Fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bhqmEEFLLJvqKMMUA4mchTx3MeNZuR2/afDDIdZkb3k=; b=rRFhBqNd0rVB8jTYJVIhPnD8sZkRUS2LaPm55mxwxYlC1GOzKIEBEE19Km6K0ZR4dO 61Y2fU3vHC6P2QmpQQmkcVcnLnKZkOs8VTopyfaNL4CmM7W/a0AV/DUkEXHHihcULF5w rVpV8urZ0eGRKVct9caFcmepBl67SPch2t+8zHZyZk/GDohexPpVwnuIv4uiKf22GuRS KYFocKoqx/+z5fciiXCgKZB5K4+4uO+DgyqfJKdYjmpc/7VrJ1Bl1/aX7wsFDpj5SaRd pk1OfRPBT6WjEZb0pKJZKNrhhYuCxhY0q5Jdc4elQ0wm7Pk6FvVn+uwRG8PIQQX70xQD 38WQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGOXBFj7IcFHJ5iFH1DOM1AwCwtwTx3TStIJY+a4a8vDK9/JiTe dMt9iedxzI2KvD4UFfu1Do28a4K2kWLLJSloCwgw6A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd77D99Dhs8xtvXvJqDzejwKuskolFJhHDKM63+dTaLGR7Pb7jmxqYECtekAeGpc0VMZFzX48/o3SXnNl6OhaE=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:4c9b:: with SMTP id q27-v6mr21839124jad.38.1533092836810; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:b442:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1m_LP2ZcG9yR1DggwRg7KOeuRwTzrsX67iBxkpXekjxUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <153307610896.3243.16744625445592133652.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPt1N1m_LP2ZcG9yR1DggwRg7KOeuRwTzrsX67iBxkpXekjxUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:06:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=1Gc6LMMNMV_8vPaMevtO0kZ0ni0ysHSYJHcjgOQfGrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f239ec057256fd11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KwonbJV_b8oFiiW2b6HBcQIgrj4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 03:07:19 -0000

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> The server is specifying the retry delay, so if the client adds
> randomness, that could result in more collisions rather than fewer.
>
>
>> S 8.2.
>> >      The table below indicates, for each of the three TLVs defined in
>> this
>> >      document, whether they are valid in each of ten different contexts.
>> >
>> >      The first five contexts are requests or unacknowledged messages
>> from
>> >      client to server, and the corresponding responses from server back
>> to
>> >      client:
>>
>> Nit. This text is a tiny bit hard to read, because you don't list S-P,
>> etc.
>>
>
> Hm, I believe that this should be using the requester/responder
> vernacular, not the client/server vernacular.   I've asked the team to
> confirm.
>

No, in fact I was incorrect about this.   I've added text to explain the
S-* messages as well.

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email