Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05

Federico Santandrea <federico@xylant.net> Mon, 10 October 2016 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <federico@xylant.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4FA129485 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xjex9gFxqgge for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1500612945C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC431720B8; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:59:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G0ZctbYD8sG0; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 94.160.141.245
Received: from android-dcdd2f14fc3242c6.huawei.com (unknown [94.160.141.245]) (Authenticated sender: federico@xylant.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3708D17209F; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:59:19 +0200 (CEST)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20161009173634.34142.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20161009173634.34142.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: Federico Santandrea <federico@xylant.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:59:15 +0200
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <A446794A-3F41-48C4-89F0-B9EDE4DD1AFF@xylant.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/L0SSvkKVXIkaQ3oQ4huzxPkadtY>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 05:59:26 -0000

Il 9 ottobre 2016 19:36:34 CEST, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> ha scritto:
>There is absolutely no standardization or commonality in the protocol
>switches that people use for non-DNS names.  For .local it's in
>library routines like gethostbyname() that map names to IP addresses,
>for .onion it's in a SOCKS proxy that opens a connection to a remote
>host and for those of us old enough to remember .uucp and .bitnet, it
>was in a switch table in the mail configuration that determined what
>program to call to do the next hop.  It's not much use providing an IP
>address lookup handler for something that doesn't use IP addresses.

Right. In the light of that the only useful feature would be the first
part of 1 - which is already in the draft. I should have known
better.

>I hate to bring this up, but we might want to reconsider whether .alt
>is still the best name for this hack.  For us old nerds, .alt reminds
>us of usenet and uucp of yore, but in American politics it's some
>unpleasant fringe groups with which I would not want to be associated
>even a little bit.  Keeping in mind that we want to encourage people
>to use .alt, I'd rather find something with no political (or other)
>connotations.

This I tend to agree with, didn't bring up the issue in my message
because it wouldn't add to my point and would make for less
clarity.


-- 
Federico