IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D126120874 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcCuOxeh5cbU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [17.171.2.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D698612088E for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 01J27Lbf005375; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=sender : from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=GOEMaDKdw+YbFx7TT+zcVUlRlI78ri49urRHZs9/o6o=; b=wYd597BdaBkKxBIV2D2Wmy/UhMUsT6x0kFbnoEa05+uncDRgW4yG+Z9MkDUI2tPWgWhj GbNwS58aNJnFytFfACB1Le1Mrf3ul+n4I4/3EQAcwcvxg1sNDXhfgyiaaC8NaRD9PcvX k2dWQIZOVH6qQNIzdewOFCyHBsDTz47NHPk13O7DONsYvLNLCZqToTKcTf2MbHZmgZai EzAIw4fLHded9msZvBY6tyb9bwK2giQN+TA7muv29LVDo97Ux4BQDW0WaI7ou15wK+C1 WkzhXdrbpPtZPGlZzuul2dnK7fIiwW7ef3sJtbz/W8ovRE1i+1//QCQAsgB3ZFGoezx5 Vw==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.151]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 2y6e6w7t5c-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:21 -0800
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com [17.128.115.122]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.1.20190704 64bit (built Jul 4 2019)) with ESMTPS id <0Q5X00LAGF81VMG0@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com by nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) id <0Q5X00E00ES2DF00@nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 8e0de9474585da1f2e3297ed6a04f04d
X-Va-E-CD: 62133ab4a9739c5f64852e60f7de51b6
X-Va-R-CD: 54edffc754fab665f2a7ca0a9c2455be
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 4f8bfbd2-b65b-40a8-827c-b0e75c5141f9
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 8e0de9474585da1f2e3297ed6a04f04d
X-V-E-CD: 62133ab4a9739c5f64852e60f7de51b6
X-V-R-CD: 54edffc754fab665f2a7ca0a9c2455be
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: d23a943b-19b6-4c87-98e3-0eb60a9e6506
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2020-02-18_08:,, signatures=0
Received: from [17.234.61.172] (unknown [17.234.61.172]) by nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) with ESMTPSA id <0Q5X007FVF80M880@nwk-mmpp-sz10.apple.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tpauly@apple.com
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <F25B5671-4DD0-4590-A65D-DF732389B038@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8FA894C8-1AB5-4BA0-9A09-0B7EB39FD047"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.7.2.3\))
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:12 -0800
In-reply-to: <CAMOjQcFGXEQNY5dWrH+yc4uvvJfU8BuS43cmo1mpgh_Di=J37w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Olli Vanhoja <olli.vanhoja@gmail.com>, dnsop <DNSOP@ietf.org>, Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
To: Eric Orth <ericorth=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de> <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMOjQcFGXEQNY5dWrH+yc4uvvJfU8BuS43cmo1mpgh_Di=J37w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.7.2.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-18_08:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/L37_NklyrVd3N7nKutY2noC65dA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:07:30 -0000

+1 to the liveness of SVCB. As seen in the work on GitHub, there’s engagement from people working on ESNI and other use cases. I’ve been following the draft on GitHub and testing implementations, for example.

Tommy

> On Feb 18, 2020, at 10:07 AM, Eric Orth <ericorth=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hasn't been discussed much lately on this list (I keep meaning to get back to the chain-length discussion from a month or so back), but SVCB is definitely very much still alive.  Lots of work is going on in its github to prepare the next draft, so I assume we'll have another round of discussions here soon whenever that is ready.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:17 AM Olli Vanhoja <olli.vanhoja@gmail.com <mailto:olli.vanhoja@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 16:20 Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de <mailto:Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>> wrote:
> 
> I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a little 
> bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but is now 
> dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some insight 
> whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to stay with the 
> allegories ;-)
> 
> SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub.
> 
> I can't talk on behalf of the authors of the ANAME draft, but to me it seems that SVCB is getting more traction and it addresses the core problems that ANAME was supposed to solve.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email