Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Wed, 07 November 2018 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE330130E0F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:13:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8L_c120xIiEU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B05127332 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.8.255] (unknown [94.205.245.246]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DD4023692; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 04:13:19 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1541560399; bh=TTuYzBkpNAlg6qiVoBbxDjBCEwVMJPNSP2TZDN3KA5Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R64BOJLWxsTWQxsFPo9ZBgPnSlcUnnQV4FCBztvmP1OvhgsKP42DXDYFtpEceOO64 oY2tydrZizg1uUK4t0Ndp9uNgJ2hKrLdOwfwg4uhCHMfQis4LG7bMNg+2nJ0q3YpIY VLZj8tOs6UB9PxUHrIeO0e4A8EeF4VJIqU7CI5bk=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 07:13:16 +0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.1r5552)
Message-ID: <171C46F7-385A-4629-ACD8-E82C1C39699F@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <c689532b-ba85-338a-3e2f-3da59786e114@bellis.me.uk>
References: <CAH1iCirXYsYB3sAo8f1Jy-q4meLmQAPSFO-7x5idDufdT_unXQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811021543210.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20181105083526.GA12204@besserwisser.org> <7704C350-256A-42E3-B718-38FD449A2ADE@hopcount.ca> <770d5dc8-b8a3-c1c3-553f-0e9504389750@bellis.me.uk> <CAJhMdTODiJ7DvN5=sFnvEj-FP=M=2yDN_enk17Bo=En9V8bLjw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811061338450.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAJhMdTO+tRhyUhArcNUhxqvkCXKCSBfF_-Ts+7WSOV8Qf_ToEg@mail.gmail.com> <8E469ACD-3E5D-41C7-BE2D-A20A82FA8421@frobbit.se> <c689532b-ba85-338a-3e2f-3da59786e114@bellis.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_6EBBB731-0219-4C85-AE47-114BB4A64DD3_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/L4rjMQnR4ZW1rIjs7_opGbfeR1c>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fundamental ANAME problems
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 03:13:28 -0000

On 6 Nov 2018, at 22:30, Ray Bellis wrote:

> You can have wildcard support, or you can have prefixes (hence
> delegation), but you can't have both.

Thats exactly my point. URI solves "the other problem".

   Patrik