Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 10 October 2016 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36591129517 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XtISANwn3mm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02190129689 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F49B28051E; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:35:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697C428034B; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:35:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6768FB38003; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:34:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 614273FBB8; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:34:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:34:37 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <20161010143437.zeay65juueutqwoe@nic.fr>
References: <a63bb766-527b-c752-22a1-fccae8535ddc@xylant.net> <20161009173634.34142.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161009173634.34142.qmail@ary.lan>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/L8L0gz7GYsfV3Y1NKzL_OuGnDps>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, federico@xylant.net
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:35:11 -0000

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 05:36:34PM -0000,
 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote 
 a message of 47 lines which said:

> I hate to bring this up, but we might want to reconsider whether .alt
> is still the best name for this hack.

May be the author of the I-D should change every occurrence of .alt by
TODO-NAME-TO-BE-DISCUSSED-LATER so we can focus on the idea and avoid
discussions about the name?