IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A draft about the Name:Wreck problem draft-dashevskyi-dnsrr-antipatterns

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 14 April 2021 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013343A0D70 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 05:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBTM8MYKP5a4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 05:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647923A0D6B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 05:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D2032281248 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id CC9A6281250; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5380281248 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFF960911A0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A99BB3FEA4; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:47:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:47:06 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210414124706.GC12570@nic.fr>
References: <20210414090142.GA12570@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20210414090142.GA12570@nic.fr>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.9
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-16-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.4.9.2830568, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.4.14.123016, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.82.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2021.4.14.5820000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LGFagzC6WvU36uH8zKBLirQS25s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A draft about the Name:Wreck problem draft-dashevskyi-dnsrr-antipatterns
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:47:39 -0000

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:01:42AM +0200,
 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote 
 a message of 10 lines which said:

> The Name:Wreck compression pointer issue

Also
<https://www.scmagazine.com/home/security-news/vulnerabilities/namewreck-is-the-latest-collision-between-tcp-ip-and-the-standards-process/>
talks about what IETF should do. (The article contains several errors
about the RFC process.)

> “I mean I don’t want to be the one telling the [Internet Engineering
> Task Force] how to do their work. Things have worked for more than
> 40 years on the internet because of the RFC systems,” he said. “But
> indeed, I do believe that it’s time that we think of an
> alternative.”

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email