IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Re: Moving DNS64 (RFC6147) to Internet Standard

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 10 April 2026 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E391D9EBBAA; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1775850847; bh=UG6tUnOmU+96fUyh6Q61Eyu8K8QnnYaOjcCbzpPd/9Y=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=EBDoOCTRo2iYPLG41hp4KYC5b/rVkXrIlPEKjbbNxiqieQTnYFzrWQJOlVy9P/tm3 SPJcaKxZE0zuYi1LZ6uAo3lTg2b5w/VfoK64CPQMNIu+40R9AEW6GoUfvzMAwShkok GPWp/HlIHMV3n8NWVh3faDdi3P9Yd+P+89XxWVeU=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfIHSEM7Wgby; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D45D9E9A96; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE1918013; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id pqol2tcDqDLT; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1775850450; bh=M4Pp5vuOoytMrN8Hn8Jyw2Q3efC/efqq4lnbAepbMZI=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SydaO77Tbfmx8xOMdFByefhRJx7RP+lE9e6Exo0iRDJA7zB2CAPJDvCF+7Cz8rVVU +pZLwiyGG+cMENCe/DPh0CFy9jf8LP3pkryhx72iu297qDtN7Wxcgv9O51FfMXeTus Bwh0caM4Yo1SDrlx6d1V7umTsC23dQgiT2XVdPioFxE4kIkKSesZRpiRm/pD6FQt4r SiObuR36PsB90t9ZV9Vq7hpcOoD97efP8sCFQ+1BFuS5EcJ1CqaRjbo5nrfkljYh1X 9oSelSDRd4EdnNtz45bg+cDOpQwkeFt12GthjYzOYmpcGXZbgmLt8wTV7U7D5A0638 4LUF7/jkXqapQ==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF1518011; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081961EE; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AA531AEF-836A-4A4E-83D6-3579EEB246F1@icann.org>
References: <m1wAunU-0000NEC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <2338256.t9SDvczpPo@localhost> <038ae9d1-34fc-4085-aa6d-76ef79287857@gmail.com> <PARP264MB6760A67BB8F2060962E8A64088592@PARP264MB6760.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <B93DB6C8-2974-4915-93DE-DFCB6B858AFA@consulintel.es> <21557.1775841053@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <AA531AEF-836A-4A4E-83D6-3579EEB246F1@icann.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:47:30 -0400
Message-ID: <7053.1775850450@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: ELU5KVTSNJ62ZSENUFOY3ABMJ5WI3IKI
X-Message-ID-Hash: ELU5KVTSNJ62ZSENUFOY3ABMJ5WI3IKI
X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Re: Moving DNS64 (RFC6147) to Internet Standard
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LHJZWzy8htWHQH7_qgQpQel2YYo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
    > As a process issue, I don't think that DNS64 can be moved to Internet
    > Standard and at the same time add wording to it that says how it should
    > or should not be used on the Internet.

We are allowed to edit/clarify when we move to IS.
(We are also strongly encouraged to rip out anything that has no deployment)

    > I also don't think RFC 6147 *has* to be moved to Internet Standard at
    > the same time as other IPv6ish things are being moved up. Because of
    > the significant amount of hesitancy shown, I don't think it is
    > appropriate to move the standard up without a revision of its use and
    > applicability statements. If those are accepted, it can be moved to IS
    > a few years later.

I see removing applicability to be consistent with going to IS.
We nuked IA_TA out of DHCPv6 (STD102) between 8415 and 9915.
{Temporary addresses are obsoleted)
It's not forbidden. It's just obsolete going forward.

I think that the only time we have to reset the timer is when we change bits
in the wire.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
]       My working hours and your working hours may be different.            [
]  Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours   [

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status