Re: [DNSOP] Clarifying referrals (#35)

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Wed, 29 November 2017 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D65128B4E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:19:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KH6qfR7bz1vT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9191275F4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:19:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f140so8656911wmd.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:19:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=APGrBN4nDjkPjG8n4AU+Xz+4hABSjK3zXnJekvjDU9M=; b=NtgvHsZNgx2Hi8Rh0mMAmzIx/A1X9R+OUMwa5VtjArgEdIYZukd1K6xzIsoHuagkP2 +UUdHBvG5sq8StiiC8SiaIF9/ipfXmviCDxV9/l7gIejitcifikeOYFC4cz2VQ7Qv3rq iin3lojiD59rOUezvFEKtQ007+cBzMpyCxriTsuKjvV+twMhSQbuX3meYSn4AYgt2Jpd 13aDiR7zPy+XAu9yqLobONZE3MJmyHmnvFgCXWakS84ZyQ2aPI99qLnTqZXWc4CVsFvJ 6S8I6EoeOcA2VaEh7kguImiSuhyjNkHVfh2Jc3fRM+MgcFYI8LTZbCdgkgTcvjhr3DRK /oHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=APGrBN4nDjkPjG8n4AU+Xz+4hABSjK3zXnJekvjDU9M=; b=qriY5S5EeYCuHpicZk3wT3+q60d6d3KnyV/OwdW6GUnicbaG/yQaCGey2Tw6JAkMoo g20WRxa/8TJ37yt52ekAMczdvD8mq7QRvwasWBQxz1aNM804oeDFdoXVtQh5AynrMLsA qAgvxebpFPPQ65d9gVAjzsfyGiZd3H8bOG3O3tqq5qXvlQVaPcTt8eV5uSh5RYx6BFwR I/1bTztUc2WNXXW5hp/8ym6ygaf8XSBnrmE6NRFsr2xygNcLATumgngNyyb9Bv2KtawJ dVBijGmvWV41qb2gygawRUsvF8gsMTYgWI781OqgffRYpclwSnhdjONHgWM+a3b/YRfu q+7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6B2nO1NYTMOI3bZjYrrzAbhmkjtIJwjRG3cLd2J0Pj1iWAikgP wd0wQquJ/wBhpECcq0K5I5RuBatcap4ngsSha74=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYVilnLnerwmWrycMtaugNTce8Jtg7sxSrE3ZdvTKiNn4tMOc6pM8stHmCDU8kE5dRvKFreX0Ryxf2cChcp3iM=
X-Received: by 10.28.120.2 with SMTP id t2mr133345wmc.5.1511990360032; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:19:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rwfranks@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.151.197 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:18:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20171129121706.4zh4kgx3wmtucmpc@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <20171112075445.tf2ut5dxzhhnqe7l@mx4.yitter.info> <20171128195025.ifzwsjk42wz7ard6@mx4.yitter.info> <FAA4A6D6-1454-4705-B87F-1FB96CC50658@isc.org> <20171129014436.sx546yjwvobepnyp@mx4.yitter.info> <8E36C30A-A7BC-4908-BE06-6D2B8B469006@isc.org> <20171129015303.kthpahbi6w6m645d@mx4.yitter.info> <AE976F3F-0270-4484-BCE4-FE0E9BF9D03E@isc.org> <20171129020347.b3zq3rcwsubmrlhh@mx4.yitter.info> <476FF2A7-DB80-40B6-917A-2675497DD6FC@isc.org> <20171129121706.4zh4kgx3wmtucmpc@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:18:39 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hUar0UVlpH9dPF9LcorLm4pBvd4
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri4T1h0n2r-Zp5xUUvW4n+u4oFPww2SDRnqwQMBF_wjY0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082f98bc5047ea055f25b083"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LWNEqBgiiUe5FA3qH1DwFd_R7Mg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Clarifying referrals (#35)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:19:28 -0000

On 29 November 2017 at 12:17, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 01:14:13PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > When the CNAME refers to a name that is out of zone and the target zone
> is below
> > a zone that the server serves you will have CNAME (DNAME) + referral.
> >
> > 4.3.2 loops.
>
> This part I got.
>
> >       pass 1 -> 3a  (adds CNAME, AA is set as it matches the question
> section, QNAME is updated).
>
> This is the CNAME response, yes, ok.
>
> >       pass 2 -> 3b  (we have a partial match with a bottom of zone cut
> which adds the referral).
> >
>
> Right, and the authoritative server can't proceed, but the referral is
> necessary.  Good, this is helpful, thanks.  This also means, of
> course, that in such a response the answer section isn't empty.  Is
> this why you call it a "partial referral"?
>

And said referral could be to an arbitrary node in the DNS tree,  i.e.
possibly "upward"?

Or am I missing something?




>
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>