Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 09 May 2022 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455E5C159492;
Mon, 9 May 2022 08:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5F3JDaUmWVfo; Mon, 9 May 2022 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC42C14F742;
Mon, 9 May 2022 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9])
by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D26252A0CA;
Mon, 9 May 2022 08:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>,
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org,
dnsop@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
References: <165209323081.19575.8557205125835090200@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 08:40:57 -0700
In-Reply-To: <165209323081.19575.8557205125835090200@ietfa.amsl.com> (Robert
Wilton via Datatracker's message of "Mon, 09 May 2022 03:47:11 -0700")
Message-ID: <ybl8rrasohi.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LXb2O583bQa1JJZ8r2EWgPql5q8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 15:40:59 -0000
Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes: > One minor point, I found it slightly confusing in various places as to whether > "iterations" meant "total number of interactions" or the "iterations parameter" > that refers to the number of extra interactions. Hence I would suggest > changing "iterations" to "iterations parameter" or "extra iterations" or "total > iterations" in various places depending on the context to ensure that this it > is clear/obvious in all places. Thanks Rob, I can see where people less familiar with the NSEC3 protocol could easily get misled and will look at the wording throughout the document. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-iet… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft… Wes Hardaker