Re: [DNSOP] [art] Another look - draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-05.txt

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 26 March 2018 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD451120725; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L1AonKFPYxkB; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 532321277BB; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w2QFSLRQ030438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:28:21 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1522078101; bh=VDcygwnWTpzi4CZWBH2wpYO23pY+huYc/IvESjvCB3k=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=n1tUPqFQ0hNtjFG+T0mAAQ+6kyIOaifYrg54gEW3IiLTUpBlMk3IJbAzawS66SA1+ Fg5qm61AObjD6j3wHQeGcwlhV2WLjwFcFZmC6146kH+vO8nfjXxy4jrxOOCbqRqfFV 7EUYMT0KWv3OVJCHO0w6zYtgLbKTTfWYQp0LfJjw=
To: Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com>
Cc: art@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <f7b85bac-b050-5003-2df0-a48b1ef2f929@dcrocker.net> <e1f41670-ada8-eaac-468c-c712b338a10b@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803201804440.8940@dhcp-8344.meeting.ietf.org> <A7711F58-5145-49E8-9158-B2F94D0EABBF@redbarn.org> <7c168dc1-2ea7-d47e-78b7-0380e5d0aa84@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803211104210.9553@ary.local> <5244d327-f8ea-1590-c663-1d92e0b194c4@dcrocker.net> <5F44FA5B42805C52479DE491@PSB> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803211507380.9666@dhcp-935d.meeting.ietf.org> <1DF1564CC2B88726B2B54CF4@PSB> <20180326171842.0eacbdc4@smaug.local.partim.de>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <667675d4-0ff8-b236-eded-31f795b84af1@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:26:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180326171842.0eacbdc4@smaug.local.partim.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LcouLhGGZpv2fe2La9SZETaLrXk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [art] Another look - draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:27:00 -0000

On 3/26/2018 8:18 AM, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
> Which also reminds me: The DANE RRtypes, ie., TLSA, SMIMEA, and
> OPENPGPKEY all use underscore labels and are currently missing
> from the initial table in section 3.1.


The table there is for the right-most underscore name, which RFC 6698 
seems to constrain to choices that are already list.

The left-most underscore name appears to use a rule that differs from 
the rule used by SRV, etc.  As such, these are second-level names being 
drawn from the same namespace but without coordination.  So it looks 
like there's a problem, but not with the proposed global registry (for now.)

Yes?

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net