Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0542C1CAF4E for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.542 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEl3AVlX_-UI for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35DBFC1CAF34 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c2dee9d9cfso1473920a91.3 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718029425; x=1718634225; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GpZ7G2I3ylSVh3pxxNuO0MuC+T69TPYbihe/f1oCSk4=; b=FjmAWpMz8FFvhA2PQDwO6LRIzSOwkRmOq/s24z5P2pOD5zsNte9kN31LCau2aQttrW zHMGbE2Owzs18NZA2gJtjczNPWEN/k4I3J6FktiXAqJ3znPwBvkLybUCDNcxVNfOaygc v9avnHuV3qDQqcV+1puwnWRPKZqtUipaJ+IPaEiSDhPPT6uPvAFT8mB6/FhF4RTldfvn OO462F3DIbNISFzuSEcqCT3I10PAwiqMDGfOgaEcFGyFQPswfjURWcuDcz0drwCmgCKL i7fvDCcQ97XYQEdLsrNXu2nXxp03Qg9X+kCgCZeTVUYzpLyaxZPBzmCRAOB87EUrRLi+ MzoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718029425; x=1718634225; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GpZ7G2I3ylSVh3pxxNuO0MuC+T69TPYbihe/f1oCSk4=; b=Rx7Qu3Znm0Kz/aapcr/js4Ds+EYU1fQqXGoeRR0DBA+5WKjlySnJTMfrb6lg6bEYXo qRptLF2Ji2lhykIc8JSJ9CgspSI4Yd5C424o1TePtk5TlJF2BjoNPJOJEbss4Tr/FBBl U/polduup5qcTK94X3V/yupAcTer5H1ZRf0zjxWux2ch5iAfFMRG/OQg4+xW2VNQspIl yruF+1EeiZJtPVFS/Ac1ERK0DltxIMUDNQ6pQDGknwXbB5bfLPLd5Fg5vZM3EJ4JvUQT cR9aNjYq90TbBlEz0P9y7ykIRSTwQ17QuHUucsAYJbuFZduIi6rABprKi3Terbn3T3b4 7WjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwICDv0I0z0/k1i0OnVh244BeojYjHFuxfLkDxTiwTifFvWqylz vas6EdScGIb+9KUezAhHdsdCLSX1YVr5azUocEF8i4pgS3Y/MvJ5T+qTsVGT99pWE6GmV33H/eH kzNKJ+4D4/qSRA1BKSLIFj+Y/m7/OR8CaaSM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFxWr8kgUfi/5IxxXLUoCDY8bEvp0lPiyBYhNqKEXm+m24luERNVQ7mrYcRmCbwEJwje4/9vpT5XN1o6AjVxW4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d18b:b0:2c2:f081:f849 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c2f081f952mr3485218a91.2.1718029424593; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:23:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Vandan Adhvaryu Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:23:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: dnsop@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009118bd061a89e532" Message-ID-Hash: 5H4Y4G64FDUGA3RZHECBKKZB5RVBFRMS X-Message-ID-Hash: 5H4Y4G64FDUGA3RZHECBKKZB5RVBFRMS X-MailFrom: vandanadhvaryu99@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BDNSOP=5D_ICANN80_-_DSYNC?= List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --0000000000009118bd061a89e532 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, Recently at ICANN80 there was a DNSSEC workshop. In one of the topics, we discussed the bootstrapping of DS records by using a NOTIFY capability (draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-01). I was wondering if the DSYNC notify comes with an "expiry" or if there should be any stringent requirements on the Parent TLD to reply to the NOTIFY in a certain time frame when DNSSEC is involved? Regards, Vandan Adhvaryu --0000000000009118bd061a89e532 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Recently at ICANN80 there was a DNS= SEC workshop. In one of the topics, we discussed the bootstrapping of DS re= cords by using a NOTIFY capability (draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-01)= .

I was wondering if the DSYNC notify comes with a= n "expiry" or if there should be any stringent requirements on th= e Parent TLD to reply to the NOTIFY in a certain time frame when DNSSEC is = involved?

Regards,
Vandan Adhvaryu
=
--0000000000009118bd061a89e532--