Re: [DNSOP] [Din] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mayrhofer-did-dns-01.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 22 February 2019 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C9A12F19D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:03:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id in0irZl6V0jA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:03:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A21612941A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:03:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445ZMr4wk6zJhw; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:03:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1550847784; bh=UMu5QpuZX2ngrZLyaCNL46T0Y7aWMwTY0w/QG7mv2CY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=n9VY7h5odGfC0UIUC1C2BLFX89pAWQGQmc8TRYjGSkdwvM/VYc/n+KnFQ2JKko+qC Oa4N8SyWYXsqmmyNDBn9hMTg7blc815ce1opALSJL+wfkYcMpmbOXz7WZIVt4+KCOS 65Kz65RjxiBh2djtM3NIz1VSmuOD1JqMg7649Iqk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umixOyv0KUCi; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:03:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:03:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CDD6B379D; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:03:02 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca CDD6B379D
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BC340D358A; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:03:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:03:02 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: din@irtf.org, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHXf=0qgxxRdVm6wwA6xs=5vVjEvFL5G9YLmxhqT9RZKn95uwg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902221000140.32276@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <154963392249.31188.16873618915255886209.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHXf=0r0DqC_XHw-2=h4ZkH5SgjzTjPMuML3GjxtQbe6so3=vw@mail.gmail.com> <20190215093714.t23ulbslbg52t2dp@nic.fr> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902151339410.28436@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHXf=0qgxxRdVm6wwA6xs=5vVjEvFL5G9YLmxhqT9RZKn95uwg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LzNKkvLS3_n3cw7xsmhjnnG2-UA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Din] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mayrhofer-did-dns-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:03:10 -0000

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:47 PM Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>> I think this document should be Experimental and not Standards Track?
>
> I was torn when i did the first revision of this. I think it depends
> on the stability of Decentralized Identifiers themselves. Once that
> schema becomes widely used, i think any protocol that connects the DNS
> and DIDs should be Standards Track. But i leave that up to "higher
> forces" as soon as i find a suitable "home WG" for that.

My idea was that if this is an IRTF document, not a DNSOP document, that
it cannot be standards track? But I might be wrong about this.

> Agreed. I've considered replacing the "instruction diff" to OpenPGP
> with a full description in the document itself.

that would be better, but with an informative reference so indeed people
know this is the "common way" of doing this and not custom to this
document.


> Yep, introduces a zone cut. Then again, i'm not sure what (if we
> introduce that schema above) the semantics of a record right unter
> _did would be.. Or would that be disallowed?

I would avoid putting something there directly, yes.

> So, would you be interested to discuss this in Prague?

Sure. I will also be in Prague the week before at NetDev.

Paul