Re: [DNSOP] On Powerbind

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Fri, 17 April 2020 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC7B3A07AB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bHxpLk4PB5j for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-f169.google.com (mail-il1-f169.google.com [209.85.166.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 695943A07C3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f169.google.com with SMTP id f82so1604622ilh.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MCXxHlse5TRw+2PSxVy7iA9reYlRQzSJIur7IR0T2i8=; b=N2cISefkNGBoS8Vw98iBy2tXo47V1FJPY3hi/t/0J7Eip6PY/pmuAjhhSFgYNixVW9 gqh3J655DpFcfl+8LAXWGZ1dpNPUl9L0g2p42DPDDzxl7Tu4T+9aacOGZwUbaMPgadvB KYiItFlv2G7pfF6BPb3oHLV6kDCFT29yyf1/5AsQcx+LVOfJPotMYPRvwza3gZNvgeTD kigN+I8hzD8iqPU1JejJy7A6bzT4/5V0PZBtBYcBhQj7AgV7Qov+7VDyKVtIW6Bi/Ta0 SbgY1oDmbcLVXuYHBRCoTRyubU5ASgwlJ5X7qeWsPyRkLSiCcHrNjpLWKUT3MyTfRQRM Nnew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY8fovw8sjXV6CZP33eJjPSm4Lr82Hck/810+N8xiiCduHQQ2mP SMpUmeBZQNnflDXCU1uZCdYFdkw5fci4Ts1yrdU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ2lurXa/yVygVWYGgqLPQMlNxfn8OT/oGRUtIXQQBr8RA/12aLVZaYRqoeT48/2JHAZh0o4JRdLuoR6Ugld/g=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8350:: with SMTP id f77mr2232634ild.257.1587118637516; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHbrMsAbHV8M2GR95nyZ-vCZOGghgxrdVD5NaTC=05q16HBd5Q@mail.gmail.com> <ybllfmxvhlr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CAHbrMsAg4KMmMzntS-sWSeYJ3CWywC=Jv5pqBFdmCFmsY3tjUw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2004141951540.5865@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHbrMsDgih9f2Et7x627JuYnZhinfWn80Zi_cBoO7UXR-gMGfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+yMHgjZzjCEhKghGb=m+zPqXep0tHgEwcojG_VpphTqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKW6Ri6pzs_-iQJeTfBuLtHaduBPTOHf-QainWn=6XvxvX1oWA@mail.gmail.com> <D63AAE46-C174-470D-88F0-2F7196CEBA80@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D63AAE46-C174-470D-88F0-2F7196CEBA80@isoc.org>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:16:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri7OjjG3MS4YD4gb5v06TUQ57kVBrMi87N12LtH6Tmq20w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olaf Kolkman <kolkman@isoc.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b0be705a379dae4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/M3H74MAGsaAQ0Es9RKqUlSaIgY4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On Powerbind
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:17:27 -0000

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 10:27, Olaf Kolkman <kolkman@isoc.org> wrote:

> Looking for this:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dnskey-flags/dnskey-flags.xhtml ?
>
I guess we were.

The extraneous bits appear to be remnants of DNSKEY's previous life as a
KEY RR, defined in RFC2535 3.1.2, and presumably now obsolete.

Thanks Olaf.

--Dick