IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Mud] looking for reference for reverse maps do not work

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 11 April 2022 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069083A09EB; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vkfnYLmbLLD; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431A33A099D; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB9D38C03; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:48:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3xOTkk4AzsE4; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA0538BDC; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1649699329; bh=riXWPdkWrG8cp0AcvFbzHrImVVOLEo674lIlzGUnLg4=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OLQJB64OR0iXVgo7A9Yr+nqIcgYk9gAkFcZHCoCDHOewcZ3rwKhOwEYZOQ5PTQjO5 ocCJ4+YEHZeTKIMr9UPFIr021AeeMzuhpt48j033FVRBLSBSmi+5XxEMMMAmxIVBEf BQTPrbCoaRn6h8Aw3TaNV2NppPrE0X6EW67CxiMRD3ozKm/XhVPU7BKibTnB0pnWzw 731flXvPXPGs6DEpMZP9QdM5eUGD8IA0ymUKscIMWxuc5Oky6FE31oBVKe6zqTrnZ6 eKUEX3AsDnSlvreZaX8+ELdVHYSO1P/V57/jnIRBj4a4G8qZrOC7lksIKommlFivwu yLbhIO9T1aayQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2553F; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:37:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org, mud@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <92E310C3-B9FA-4C8D-AB9A-06E069086BE2@anvilwalrusden.com>
References: <24231.1649691469@localhost> <92E310C3-B9FA-4C8D-AB9A-06E069086BE2@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:37:18 -0400
Message-ID: <27735.1649698638@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/M9yGwyGweh26-aIbdt1B-jX1qWs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Mud] looking for reference for reverse maps do not work
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:37:28 -0000

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
    > I tried to document this ages ago in
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations/,
    > and got so many contradictory edits (see the history) that the final
    > version ended up saying “A or maybe not-A, or maybe both, your choice,”
    > so the then-chairs decided the document wasn’t worth sending through
    > publication.

Oh.  That's why I don't want to attempt writing this myself.

So, that's not encouraging.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email