From nobody Mon Apr 11 10:37:32 2022
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069083A09EB;
 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 3vkfnYLmbLLD; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431A33A099D;
 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB9D38C03;
 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:48:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 3xOTkk4AzsE4; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
 by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA0538BDC;
 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail;
 t=1649699329; bh=riXWPdkWrG8cp0AcvFbzHrImVVOLEo674lIlzGUnLg4=;
 h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=OLQJB64OR0iXVgo7A9Yr+nqIcgYk9gAkFcZHCoCDHOewcZ3rwKhOwEYZOQ5PTQjO5
 ocCJ4+YEHZeTKIMr9UPFIr021AeeMzuhpt48j033FVRBLSBSmi+5XxEMMMAmxIVBEf
 BQTPrbCoaRn6h8Aw3TaNV2NppPrE0X6EW67CxiMRD3ozKm/XhVPU7BKibTnB0pnWzw
 731flXvPXPGs6DEpMZP9QdM5eUGD8IA0ymUKscIMWxuc5Oky6FE31oBVKe6zqTrnZ6
 eKUEX3AsDnSlvreZaX8+ELdVHYSO1P/V57/jnIRBj4a4G8qZrOC7lksIKommlFivwu
 yLbhIO9T1aayQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
 by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2553F;
 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:37:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org, mud@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <92E310C3-B9FA-4C8D-AB9A-06E069086BE2@anvilwalrusden.com>
References: <24231.1649691469@localhost>
 <92E310C3-B9FA-4C8D-AB9A-06E069086BE2@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;
 <'$9xN5Ub#
 z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:37:18 -0400
Message-ID: <27735.1649698638@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/M9yGwyGweh26-aIbdt1B-jX1qWs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Mud] looking for reference for reverse maps do not work
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:37:28 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
    > I tried to document this ages ago in
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-con=
siderations/,
    > and got so many contradictory edits (see the history) that the final
    > version ended up saying =E2=80=9CA or maybe not-A, or maybe both, you=
r choice,=E2=80=9D
    > so the then-chairs decided the document wasn=E2=80=99t worth sending =
through
    > publication.

Oh.  That's why I don't want to attempt writing this myself.

So, that's not encouraging.

=2D-=20
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T consulti=
ng )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmJUZ04WHG1jcitpZXRm
QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZTtvB/98FdfSaxP5k6Dt1RJnjnEn9V//
9KnV1xiQIlXPvIRN0Y4gvXP0yzzhYc/QIsHn+1XDAvfI3rDPR7PZktKeinL5/D0m
8CmvOosx7J4TY9QNeOE6Z6RpSX+EVmiydoqVl7s8m3Ip1S4X1FJZFpSBAxfFBV3T
xfqbZ/EZT01NlF8G21VVPjEWT+htj3iZDSds6l+kKwd546UJQU5RjXCv4JsLRHYW
YCeRj2jwGTSer6BHKYtaH+yc+2cuzUlTYNgx5h1/d3+16JQFtENzWwsYYsPHX2c+
UDwYkd/rQOAIIt2y4uuZmRf07zppmpt9bp4S320V2ijqO1WKdapPivPf5Xyz
=t4BT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

