Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement) to Informational RFC

[Bob Harold <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:17 PM, The IESG <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
> (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Special-Use Domain Names
> Problem Statement'
>   <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2017-06-20. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>    The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761
>    has been shown through experience to present unanticipated
>    challenges.  This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive,
>    of the problems that have been identified.  In addition it reviews
>    the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications
>    and some publications from other organizations relating to Special-
>    Use Domain Names.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


 Minor nit:

4.1.2.  Special-Use Domain Names

Last part of the last sentence:"they can only use the mDNS protocol be used
for resolving that Domain Name."
Looks like "be used" is redundant and should be removed.

-- 
Bob Harold