Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-07.txt

Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Wed, 01 November 2017 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53DD13F9C1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGAEggL04n3B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gro.dd.org (gro.dd.org [207.136.192.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F21613FE71 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 425813F44E; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:39:48 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23034.8964.229814.270892@gro.dd.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:39:48 -0400
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, "."@dd.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8CsQShE3XOxbvv_DC_TNb3vChCqk7pG4kH-A26Cb97B1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150940619490.28403.7485909732104218964@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8CsQShE3XOxbvv_DC_TNb3vChCqk7pG4kH-A26Cb97B1A@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/MLkiHIdl7DDZSQcJFO9RE_Bz9dA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:39:52 -0000

Bob Harold writes:
> I don't understand this section:
> 
> 5.1.1. On-the-fly Signatures
>  ...
>    One possibly mitigation for addressing the risk of keeping the zone
>    signing key online would be to continue to keep the key for signing
>    positive answers offline and introduce a second key for online
>    signing of negative answers.

How dreadfully embarrassing.  I'm responsible for that.  It was an
underdeveloped thought about how multiple keys can possibly be used in
a zone to sign different answers.  Clearly in the form it made it into
the draft it's a bit nonsense.  My apologies.

It's kind of orthogonal to the main thrust of the BULK proposal though
so I expect this bit will just disappear in the next version.