Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague

George Michaelson <> Thu, 14 March 2019 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F60131110 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3a-2rLKJTFwS for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285161279A8 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f6so3522169iop.3 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W6yfIj1GiT7uj4i4CXnRTr4cznK+qnV6Wp/Z5W+hr74=; b=EtzBKFGADhg5VkEkDkMz0XgwDGbiYWRzXwGyjXj/SsHLImLu1A9SObjBDwzX7cqwY9 KPVUYovynmg84O8kLL46yiADpjVos46aVuWrfJfkFEQZ5B/EfZtjXxnPw3VkoaU1wcJg zJtmXHFKNRfrWZpUR44/WoVZz8El9uVnuZIDUNNjdZdZn02pasPDBT8p5YAW33eanPRL GFgt5QZbfrYBIUrpyw83usH3c390cM818DxZ0ny8RosKtoXErK6mMWfhMPLwRNCjkBYQ LtUFtyZCzn8+02HKiZeGwscuS3dWAY0ZGJgVgKVpOHLFz8PY1x63pHWMQz/8/1sf9/qI tnag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W6yfIj1GiT7uj4i4CXnRTr4cznK+qnV6Wp/Z5W+hr74=; b=geacfEevsSPlkFvvlpCElstHIHUWDHOPHiY1T9ifUPQujD+QSvUeVfAg3g7mE+bstF TC9hpOgfiDXBGwrPccWCtUWHK9WHUItPONy2v54Nc51TohKBNNbNN6PgLcIt4+JY3Job O4wPlUjz6qGS8oySnEK/07lF9koGviQR4e0kl3PJC/X92mDV1OCF8unPHOF7MVY74cKo KyqLQmNO92suZeSFKNTBUhdbceTtBLRKJJXBe4/vWPL51/0cPozwcmB/AB0XrGDJJXOL Jqe2ghEFmAh/gH2oosdwbMDTwGAFkUncyl4v4tPeamiX1pVYCJropZrgUqEf7ReqXQbD ORgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVU9vqQup2Fz+AdaBcAbj+yjgpHYjVfWE9TdPlat+mfzLW+6mf3 UNP5io+uTA/wmFaIEPanJLRbThdSoBeo5RzAr0SmKQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwna0F6F+WCbPesDmHiENnePHXHQsQ87m7S31so6rwryND+tXfar8WoJf38amCO/o7KWhoCcYh33lR//03egvI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d304:: with SMTP id s4mr22429771iob.228.1552525810399; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <> <2044747.4WdMZHU4Qz@linux-9daj> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: George Michaelson <>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:09:58 +1000
Message-ID: <>
Cc: dnsop WG <>, DoH WG <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 01:10:16 -0000

we're in danger of acronym soup here. RDNS can refer to reverse-DNS
( and and I think usurping it for Resolverless
DNS is an interesting moment.


On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:49 AM Ted Lemon <> wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 2:52 PM, Paul Vixie <> wrote:
> please do not relegate discussions about the loss of operator control over the
> RDNS control plane
> Although it’s certainly true that DNS is used as a control plane by many operators, there is no standard “RDNS control plane.”   If you think there should be, that’s something that the IETF could conceivably work on, but it’s not something that the DoH working group is obligated to treat as a standard use of DNS.   And I don’t think it’s a topic on which there is consensus in the IETF.
> The problem with the discussion we’ve been having about DoH and how it affects your “RDNS control plane” is that we’re talking past each other, not that the discussion should be had elsewhere.   It’s fine for there to be a discussion, but if there is going to be a discussion, participants need to engage constructively, and not just fling slogans at each other.
> _______________________________________________
> Doh mailing list