Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Mon, 09 March 2015 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CEA1A911E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cf8Y_QgOTeKM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0D21A912D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48CA1FCBD7; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 42177216C31; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:41:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:41:49 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: "Rose, Scott W." <scott.rose@nist.gov>
Message-ID: <20150309174149.GC73444@isc.org>
References: <20150304125319.14932.18909.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8B+rOiq+f6dP6o3uFSH+J+q04Q-6eADSpXj0kE_R2bRHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150309141235.GA4605@nic.fr> <CA+nkc8D-T4G7KMy8=OPb4ibKjFeC+R91OgzguZfP4cho0JD3gg@mail.gmail.com> <37BD14A6-D71C-44DC-8ED0-5CC145B922CC@nist.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <37BD14A6-D71C-44DC-8ED0-5CC145B922CC@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ma8RL-b8wYtxb_pwKJmQHUVWxgc>
Cc: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:41:58 -0000

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:22:41AM -0400, Rose, Scott W. wrote:
> The usual phrasing in the sentence would be "less than" or "fewer than".  

Suggested alternate wording:

 Thus, in some cases, a resolver using qname minimisation 
 could send counter-ituitively fewer upstream queries than
 a traditional iterative resolver.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.