IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se> Mon, 22 February 2010 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jakob@kirei.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522A028C3BE for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdaGbAu81jvt for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kirei.se (wagaya.kirei.se [91.206.174.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCD428C3B6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kirei.se; s=wagaya20060620; t=1266874194; bh=4NBJFbrcQGNHyBn46/yMB182dHvTFBjlyNtWooOyke0=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=ZKfhMTewl3u+KRXHZqq4L5AQDbnAI7jc9QF6vtqHOARLFBEBHDMUFp3dxqm2QpLqi pKp8Mrjq2uaBaH1j5vi5qC09ZQQNP9wQTtfrP8xaxTQqMb5yTIRb8LxjS5QbC8+SxP X8jRWeIFL9Hps0LgQijDYI2STVLcFjn9CqLvsDmk=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>
In-Reply-To: <20100222161758.GF2228@dul1mcmlarson-l1-2.local>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:29:50 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C06E7ED2-9DE1-4912-A30A-3E19B0F55291@kirei.se>
References: <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl> <24C8A8E2A81760E31D4CDE4A@Ximines.local> <8E6C64ED-A336-4E8B-996F-9FB471EB07C6@NLnetLabs.nl> <4B7FE58C.5030605@ogud.com> <20100220202751.GB54720@shinkuro.com> <20100220213133.GE2477@isc.org> <4B807DC0.9050807@ogud.com> <315AD36E-879A-4512-A6A8-B64372E3D3CF@sinodun.com> <201002220022.o1M0M3qR048760@drugs.dv.isc.org> <d3aa5d01002212013x50993902xa8be099c09aefd16@mail.gmail.com> <20100222161758.GF2228@dul1mcmlarson-l1-2.local>
To: Matt Larson <mlarson@verisign.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:28:04 -0000

On 22 feb 2010, at 17.17, Matt Larson wrote:

> +1, total and complete agreement.  I am adamantly opposed to including
> any text about SHA1 hash collisions in an NSEC3 context.

+1.

	jakob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email