Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01 feedback

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Fri, 13 December 2019 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AEE12021D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 07:02:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtFnzOjtKXJf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 07:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7172712088F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 07:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:cc31:80f5:145b:124c] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:cc31:80f5:145b:124c]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7406140E7C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:02:22 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1576249343; bh=6g4tSCeDnSTvOWuIDxoZ3kB8ypAHCu0z0wbL1MbFZTE=; h=From:To:Date; b=O9F8dvyDSy7tYJrezKNDdHl5XZSpVCcjnyz7LYWYuqVJMrz0G37hUunbwhnK4PO1d Wq3zvDO/pyFtNo18n4q2ErS29GrZiAh9+bHU4++BR4hj6xG0wZQHbfTCHG1itpsT/j V+Oa2b/PhZ0oFzNcOGN2iH47EELDnihDFF1H9tZs=
From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltw61yIMSMdW7DoXQ=?= <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CAMOjQcGP3=+_fb9pt3dvF27kR1ENH+=2L28EDNPQU6JF8zkrzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <79ab12de-804f-c1b3-d000-b04b02722f9e@nic.cz>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:03:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMOjQcGP3=+_fb9pt3dvF27kR1ENH+=2L28EDNPQU6JF8zkrzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/MmpNfnYNKNL340zxYaWYDd-FT0U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01 feedback
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:02:43 -0000

On 12/6/19 11:43 PM, Eric Orth wrote:
> Section 1.3: Compared to previous drafts, not much value anymore in
> SvcFieldPriority being a first-class field outside SvcFieldValue. [...]

There's still advantage for resolvers implementing the chain-jumping
(Sec. 4); it allows them to avoid looking inside SvcFieldValue.  That
might indirectly help the overall deployment, as that feature seems to
be desired a lot (on this list).

--Vladimir