Re: [DNSOP] dnssec-kskroll-sentinel-06 clarifications

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 20 March 2018 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7225F127876 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ro-48_HHuICz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1558D1200C5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64BFE3AB001; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E3B160050; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5B0160053; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id b7Kz01a_dP-C; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.90] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27122160050; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4f4fffb1-09ed-9155-5c5a-7a64fa2e5c60@nic.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:03:13 +1100
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02E114B2-C964-4451-A7A0-E210CB3D600D@isc.org>
References: <dfb0182f-fada-c1ea-93fc-4f8c29046725@nic.cz> <4f4fffb1-09ed-9155-5c5a-7a64fa2e5c60@nic.cz>
To: =?utf-8?B?VmxhZGltw61yIMSMdW7DoXQ=?= <vladimir.cunat@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/MrVYk-0XhYebvATaj1JD2dLSN-U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] dnssec-kskroll-sentinel-06 clarifications
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:03:19 -0000

> On 20 Mar 2018, at 3:10 am, Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat@nic.cz>; wrote:
> 
> On 03/18/2018 09:44 PM, Petr Špaček wrote:
>> The current text in section 5 is written with an assumption that query
>> with +CD bit cannot result in "Secure" status and thus cannot trigger
>> sentinel processing, but this depends on implementation.
> 
> I just want to note that this situation of answering +cd queries by
> validated cached RRs isn't very implementation-specific.  One way to
> come to this: it seems generally desirable to have aggressive caching
> (rfc8198) on forwarders, due to serving as a cache shared by multiple
> resolvers, and validating resolvers tend to use +cd to query the
> forwarders (rfc4035#section-3.2.2).

You can’t assume whether CD will be 1 or 0 when the client is validating.
Both types of queries are useful.  The mentioned section just fails to
discuss the CD=0 case.

> --Vladimir
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org