Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns
"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 19 November 2017 00:54 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5C51250B8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:54:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eetZObs5sUCQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:54:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CDAE124B09 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:54:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [169.254.25.203] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id vAJ0qbd9036853 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:52:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [169.254.25.203]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:54:04 -0800
Message-ID: <F5D40ADD-5C88-4169-B17B-F74211C4DD6B@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D63482C5.8C365%lee@asgard.org>
References: <D63482C5.8C365%lee@asgard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.7r5425)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ms4JxlKiKs57v-_EH0POmefLnBQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 00:54:09 -0000
On 16 Nov 2017, at 20:12, Lee Howard wrote: > I updated this draft months ago, based on feedback from the previous > WGLC, > and it expired without comment. I’ve refreshed it, and would like to > ask > again for reviews (especially if anything has changed in the past > year) and > another WGLC. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns/ This version seems fine, even without specific recommendations. From the earlier discussion in the WG, it doesn't seem like there is agreement on recommendations, and the draft covers the methods that could be used in enough detail where an operator can decide what they want to do. --Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns Lee Howard
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns Shane Kerr