IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.

Matt Larson <matt@kahlerlarson.org> Wed, 07 February 2018 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@kahlerlarson.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B6F12D848 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:32:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whie9hRYgMlZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp101.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp101.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80DB12D810 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp29.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp29.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 04FE62526E; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:32:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: matt@kahlerlarson.org
Received: by smtp29.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: matt-AT-kahlerlarson.org) with ESMTPSA id DD0C425123; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:32:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: matt@kahlerlarson.org
Received: from [192.168.1.48] (pool-71-191-205-176.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.191.205.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:32:04 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Matt Larson <matt@kahlerlarson.org>
In-Reply-To: <61a8dbfa-15bc-429f-279e-ca35dc033cd4@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:32:04 -0500
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 539713924.5875731-a1c678be5f08ad1ec03b3d781d7acda2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <848BE690-5862-4FC7-8365-0A1D5A4BAD49@kahlerlarson.org>
References: <CAHw9_iKnD4WtTKyof=nm4ChmDZ5mAPqA7a_-m1t_Lauugf4Uow@mail.gmail.com> <e8ac7bd0-26e6-cf97-e2ef-0ead50dc18ce@nic.cz> <88E7D27C-048E-44CB-B317-C892EA603D31@isc.org> <0c2a4a38-49d7-2b46-1ac8-1dda0812e217@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJ6yL12OaGW5+fm8M3YUkrj46CvC2-ob7Xrc5HEaA_Z1Q@mail.gmail.com> <f9861a96-a930-bd08-7cf5-5c6b003f706e@nic.cz> <24C74B01-FC08-41CD-BB16-FD122F9EB61A@apnic.net> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802051246230.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <FDFE42D8-B805-4336-A9A5-B81F416B3251@apnic.net> <D07FE583-06F7-436D-97EF-4747B815AD3F@vpnc.org> <20180206094215.Horde.m4xt1lsOwvQ28hAbN1r_Tg4@andreasschulze.de> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802061221510.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <2ffeba22-5cf1-4eb0-b45c-fefb7cf1d8f7@nic.cz> <CBB24E6D-D20D-42CC-95D3-82A37C26BC31@vpnc.org> <fdbd881c-d778-cd0f-a002-f1dd441f519b@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJXeRXkG8Mr_YuSkVV5HuSWNgRo5x=5=td4MhTGx38_oA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iK+5roJN6m+Wbvxe8S5GEf4Lx1Ucp8yrsOOsnFucNr_Qw@mail.gmail.com> <61a8dbfa-15bc-429f-279e-ca35dc033cd4@NLnetLabs.nl>
To: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/MuWRfbfa9tqFOy_KpJE30jKDA8E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:32:11 -0000

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 6:13 AM, Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> wrote:
> 
> On 07/02/2018 10:12, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> Whoops, last message was blank; finger fail.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Fine. Now we need to have something actionable, e.g. set of names for
>>>> Geoff to test.
>>>> 
>>>> Can we have couple proposals and test them in one go, so results are
>>>> comparable?
>>>> 
>>>> I've gathered these:
>>>> 
>>>> kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN
>>>> kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-NNNN
>>>> is-ta--NNNN
>>>> not-ta--NNNN
>>>> 
>>>> I propose longer but more descriptive variant:
>>>> kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN
>>>> kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-no-NNNN
>> 
>> <no hats>
>> 
>> I personally like "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN", or "is-ta--NNNN".
>> 
>> I really do not like
>> "kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN" as:
>> $echo "kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN" | wc -c
>>   62
> 
> 
> For what it is worth, I am with Warren, and particular like
> "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN".

+1

Matt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email