Re: [DNSOP] .ALT, was Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF781AC437 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ZZvbi8WjX1w for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9401A9107 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 33741 invoked from network); 12 May 2015 17:04:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 May 2015 17:04:54 -0000
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:04:28 -0000
Message-ID: <20150512170428.12071.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+jpobNKtim=Gw3ZAjaU6ff3A-SHVrGHqn0AW7-WOwsNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NCwIWdiNhEU-FIqTA0rI4NRK32g>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] .ALT, was Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:04:53 -0000

>... and this is some of the point of the .ALT pseudo-TLD -- if you
>want to use a "TLD" that does not get resolved in the DNS, make your
>namespace look like YYY.ALT. This *will* leak into the DNS, but should
>be "dropped" (NXD) at the first resolver (helping with privacy and
>general pollution issues). Now, if 5 people or 5,000,000 people use
>it, it doesn't matter -- it never needs to be made a special use name,
>because it isn't really in the DNS name space.

The comment in the jabber room to use .INVALID is intriguing.  I have
to say, I don't see anything that .ALT would do that .INVALID doesn't
already do, other than perhaps look slightly less ugly.

R's,
John