Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 09 March 2015 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78131A0263 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTZJWlBsOct7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E781A0262 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t291m5LG091689 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:48:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <42657AF9-53D5-4CFE-B1EB-F0235E59CFE3@ogud.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:48:05 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28BF46AB-376A-4B66-B7E1-D39F6F6DFC49@vpnc.org>
References: <20150306145217.GA8959@nic.fr> <54F9C29E.9040408@jive.com> <54F9F90D.1020806@redbarn.org> <54F9FCD3.7010204@jive.com> <54F9FDFA.2030405@redbarn.org> <CA+nkc8AyOvMwpoXQYmubxmWjKvkQwXYr1QaLPOoA1E-ahpV7wA@mail.gmail.com> <2C465FAA-166E-4BF0-97BB-20905AC4BFF4@cam.ac.uk> <42657AF9-53D5-4CFE-B1EB-F0235E59CFE3@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NM7L9KARiPT6-Hyjbsh8Sq0JN6M>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 01:48:07 -0000

On Mar 8, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> There is a new version in the works, expect it late tomorrow (monday) 
> 
> It does not outlaw ANY per say, just says limit it  to trusted parties. 
> I tries to define that resolver treat NOTIMP as long term signal that resolver should keep track of and not retry. 
> It says ignore RD=1 on meta queries. 
> It says do not upstream Meta queries 
> 
> It applies to all meta types, including RRSIG. 

Hopefully you meant "all meta types, and RRSIG as well". RRSIG is not a metatype.

--Paul Hoffman