Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 09 March 2015 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA1D1A88B3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_47=0.6, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zfaiokP_z1Iz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E224E1A8966 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 07:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id BF4E728059C; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:21:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FD1280538; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:21:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA814C0053; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:21:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:21:20 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Message-ID: <20150309142120.GA9509@nic.fr>
References: <20150306145217.GA8959@nic.fr> <54F9C29E.9040408@jive.com> <54F9F90D.1020806@redbarn.org> <54F9FCD3.7010204@jive.com> <54F9FDFA.2030405@redbarn.org> <CA+nkc8AyOvMwpoXQYmubxmWjKvkQwXYr1QaLPOoA1E-ahpV7wA@mail.gmail.com> <54FA0310.3000908@redbarn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54FA0310.3000908@redbarn.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.0
X-Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae i686
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NPXe2TLBBCiV2Ibkgwwo3ZOFihE>
Cc: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:22:19 -0000

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:42:08AM -0800,
 Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote 
 a message of 155 lines which said:

> we're in a post-snowden era, and any information leaks (such as RD=0
> queries to recursive-only servers) have to be reconsidered on the
> new risk:benefit model.

Yes. This is mentioned in "DNS privacy considerations"
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-problem-statement-02#section-2.3>