Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Sat, 04 July 2015 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C191A88E4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 00:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvHBiOqsbEAw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 00:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56911A88E0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.46] (frobbit.cust.teleservice.net [85.30.128.225]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E6391FEAB; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 09:12:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 09:12:04 +0200
Message-ID: <017CF015-8A06-40D5-9ECF-B7B7E208C7AF@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20150704063120.2380.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20150704063120.2380.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_6DE4296B-C06C-4E93-84E2-B17DD2FB030D_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NWHXZIZsr81QA2mVV8ebvImW1dc>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, bmanning@karoshi.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 07:12:09 -0000

On 4 Jul 2015, at 8:31, John Levine wrote:

> I guess my question here is, what would prevent House Finch Feathers OY from applying
>> for the DNS(IN) string ONION from ICANN because they want that as a TLD in the IN
>> class?
>
>
> At the moment, nothing.
>
> Remember, we also have a draft about .HOME and .CORP and .MAIL.  ICANN
> says they're not planning to delegate those names, but they have about
> 20 active applications and $3.7M in application fees for those names
> which suggests that their plan may not be entirely final.  That's why
> I think we need an ongoing way to identify names that should stay out
> of the DNS for engineering reasons.

+10000

Once again:

ICANN do say what strings in the name space should be TLDs.

IETF do say what strings in the name space should NOT be TLDs.

The rest are just strings waiting to end up in one of the two groups.

   Patrik