Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05.txt

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Tue, 27 September 2016 08:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D75512B123 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1wpHBVNHunu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A90E612B09F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=50286 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1boo0k-0007oa-LK (Exim 4.72) (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:45:10 +0100
To: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <147368142586.14471.16897934069436083953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6ce7ea83-5ccc-aeda-d1e4-f5e5d1ccbf53@gnu.org> <CAHw9_iKtmVh8xvwVydWUs-g9t_JiKAF7Frdx_iieSEOvQFHJ1w@mail.gmail.com> <f33a6d06-2c17-04fd-d6a7-b73274705c37@gnu.org>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <74610049-16f1-3210-7f79-8d38d596d641@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:45:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f33a6d06-2c17-04fd-d6a7-b73274705c37@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Naj3BbFFlED50xrLPdJ1FHJX0z0>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names@tools.ietf.org" <draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:45:15 -0000


On 27/09/2016 09:33, hellekin wrote:

> I remember introducing the term 'pseudo-TLD' in the P2P Names draft and
> doing a similar research as the one I cut from your message for brevity.
>  At the time I thought the Canada Dry effect would work: it looks like
> DNS, it tastes like DNS, but it's not DNS, hence 'pseudo'.  But indeed
> that can as well bring confusion.

Personally, I like the term.

Ray