Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-01

Mark,

Surely, something stronger than a reminder is appropriate.

For a mission-critical requirement, this needs to be an explicit and
unambiguous request:

    "This document directs IANA to create insecure delegations
     for the listed zones."

Dick
________________________

On 14 August 2014 01:16, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

>
>         Can we please move on this.
>
>         The reverse address are not yet insecurely delegated as
>         would be required for RFC 6598 compliance.  This is starting
>         to cause operational problems for ISP's that validate DNS
>         responses as they can't deploy local IN-ADDR.ARPA zones
>         until that insecure delegation is done.
>
>         Also should I add a reminder to the IANA Considerations that
>         the insecure delegation needs to be performed?
>
>         e.g.
>
>         "IANA is reminded that a insecure delegation for these zones
>         is required for compliance with RFC 6598 to break the DNSSEC
>         chain of trust."
>
>         Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE:  +61 2 9871 4742                         INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>