IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 30 September 2019 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBD9120170 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGuJ8wt3n59R for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250C9120178 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B10E9299DD; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+FG7qzPnLkUH7mSBca=1NfXy6YduHD4UdmcfXFjD8xC6g@mail.gmail.com> <20190917075620.avbllsx6kwbiof2z@nic.fr> <yblh84xz4qg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <1515406254.3112.1569654220499@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:07:10 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1515406254.3112.1569654220499@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> (Vittorio Bertola's message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:03:40 +0200 (CEST)")
Message-ID: <ybl8sq54hoh.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NnWyg9D2hnWs5mTbc9tvDNzz1dA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:07:12 -0000

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> writes:

> > Il 28 settembre 2019 01:41 Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> ha scritto:
> > 
> >   + Response: Those three codes were supplied in a previous comment
> >     round and they are supposed to indicate policies being applied from
> >     different sources.  Can you check the new text of them to see if
> >     they are more understandable now?
> 
> I think there was an editorial glitch, so now you have two errors #17
> and no #18 - 3.19 should become #18 again.

Yep, fixed.  Thanks.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email