IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] .arpa

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 23 March 2017 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5D8128D40 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id utXlADFlbTQz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D413B129B94 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n21so187708584qta.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=NF4bRmUOkWdxa7g9QEa/QGJnbaQZeXtajUJca4tMksQ=; b=DBSx8Jk70NyyxJ3pPS6u7Gzoqb0t6+03TyWSdfeDYwNgUY8NAqF/B02HwLDm+wGjj3 BTv55rFtphLg6cw7oSRdL0VJ8UzccsKMWu3O0zVfLYw6EBFcgQMWEQu3xpGCRLVyUSKw iM9Hp6uT6nnAnBKFR6S/fENnoowMQY5M1A2scOKyWy42FC2bbI1qfySZ9dB15ouEzUh8 IkQnauwtD9UGjHr3Hp0bgY3R841nC024op4v9ZE+Zv5seMSykRg82Xi0qzRZ5ITCoY9e vGw64fKSB05O3ihwFjT+U3z+wbdeVeeUzmwiSpeMyk3et70jp8vwvjLxB1q4df8sKuWq PLZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=NF4bRmUOkWdxa7g9QEa/QGJnbaQZeXtajUJca4tMksQ=; b=Rl1dKnRRYpFViBuzXfoTP8gQmo7Vy2yCnF2/7B5v0oqMyiECLKYXnBiubY5QXdHJ6N rN/8SQPlGAujQbMB+dkLXInoyyTWPjcgAOyN9vBUZMUBdzTMTK6NSFXI6YL2JTWg24jt w63g9myC+ySZKj1BC23iU4Vx4Gaj7Hc213m3BT5P/MjmYvKZqTiVko7hzBuMRuTiUaz9 nA3tZ9U7Q2aQLWgTZ/1fSanDre+03Hz9IjyMfSESo8pecHdhfZLHW+wuvrnLgO4g1orU WR/lOlm9oJmcThccjms0HQRtUn4ClaCM68THICfeGxi+S6m5cPT+Z0lXLNj1+xfKTjh3 88QQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2aPAWq6epulWuhhV/C9CKHRqbbXvvFq8o303Cpoyr9gS/KRUyaV4VjHDr5VvA0bQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.53.99 with SMTP id z32mr5263155qtb.106.1490306073980; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i140sm234819qke.2.2017.03.23.14.54.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <18A3100E-2135-4FD0-811A-394DDE56EC94@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_54F03C9A-F62B-41BB-98BB-670293AE5935"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:54:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <77CC814A-823F-4239-8853-97D771F02490@gmail.com>
Cc: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>, matt@kahlerlarson.org
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <20170323042741.79108.qmail@ary.lan> <2C6B4EB6-D0F0-44A8-95E4-68DF32244639@fugue.com> <20170323163205.GD19105@mx4.yitter.info> <500af1ed-5425-4452-ad8e-c2d511ee738d@bellis.me.uk> <850A8729-8762-4375-90EF-50CDF4AC232E@gmail.com> <47548136-78d7-8c53-462e-62439d6194ac@bellis.me.uk> <360B2807-049F-4707-95FE-AA279C583884@gmail.com> <F5854071-6507-444B-90DB-B0CF0C27B7D0@fugue.com> <77CC814A-823F-4239-8853-97D771F02490@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NsPJ6xlfSrIhouJkCgbPyTWoS-E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:54:37 -0000

On Mar 23, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Matt Larson just pointed out, "different protocol" may turn into a distraction.  .homenet is asking for an entry in the special-use domain name registry and a specific kind of entry in the DNS root zone.  I take those characteristics to differentiate homenet, perhaps as an extension or variant of DNS.

Is this even necessary?   The MoU uses the example of in-addr.arpa, which is resolved using the DNS protocol, so from the perspective of the MoU, I don't think it is.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email