[DNSOP] correction Re: virtual interim DNSOP WG meeting and current status, special use names

[Suzanne Woolf <[e-mail]>]

And because it’s been that day….

Thanks for the off-list nudge, that’s ***Thursday 16 February*** for most of the world, Friday 17 February for the AP region.

We’ve blocked two hours for the meeting.

Apologies for the error.


Suzanne


> On Feb 2, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Suzanne Woolf <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 3. We still want (and have time) to do a virtual interim WG meeting before Chicago. We’ve picked a date:
> 
> Thursday 17 February, 19:00 UTC, which is:
> 
> 19:00 UTC
> 20:00 CEST (Frankfurt, Stockholm)
> 14:00 EST (North American Eastern)
> 11:00 PST (North American Western)
> 06:00 AEDT (Sydney, Melbourne)
> 
> (Webex details will follow)
> 
> As usual, scheduling isn’t perfect for anyone but we tried to cover the largest possible area of the globe adequately.
> 
> Preliminary agenda for the meeting is:
> 
> 	1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>)
> 	2. Proposals for moving forward:
> 		* reviews of alt-tld; ready for WGLC? will it help? (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>)
> 		* stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process registry changes case-by-case)
> 		* proposals for process revision/update?
> 	3. Next steps: 
> 		* any drafts to write?
> 		* any input or liaison to request from the IAB? (regarding either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups)
> 	4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here
> 
> 
> thanks,
> Suzanne & Tim
>