Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 07 July 2022 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B100C15A731; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NBQTZcvAuLpH; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a10:de80:1:4091:b9e9:2215:0:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F26C15A729; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Lf0G71YndzJV; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1657206622; bh=3OaMDKlvytnpBVovfvFRj0rylqaOax9nebfaY0SEbpA=; h=Date:To:References:From:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q9WOXUuip15xBxz4Ec9BeHXNwFGTaqbZt6v/+PNFdepSLw1uio2+6OjI4O11HezDx ynNb/bE8zGpTth5QeSyw8b0/fj7ts8laHXMNF0ROvlinVJ+GlKK5VGIZfcGZooiy62 EfNKCyFOOZP2p5dIqYSCc1Io9ZaoueBGfoz2s/j5PaeeJlSBkfo8AA+MdXBGRovaGe Fp66wzwCE0VFd9qX8RYqhzGEM/1454ofg1VLNKXKxLxlTkXHCJ+PdaX058W91Jiq6t g0Mrqm9yQ5aZ/O3hQKyA3jtMYvCabR7/vAka/aFfx5qy/PJkB8mKHyxiXD9h4mWUpr bRIqaW8FfUAIg==
Message-ID: <15bbb88a-017a-bde9-7622-5996e2335e9e@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 17:10:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+FGSdnW8NbBT72vGzNL9Bdr5DrM357K4X+iAkhS+aZs0A@mail.gmail.com> <3b8026db-74a6-ff96-8329-07a16087c46d@NLnetLabs.nl> <86C99A90-E74D-4E76-9A56-D7EB5EB54093@icann.org>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Cc: DNSOP Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <86C99A90-E74D-4E76-9A56-D7EB5EB54093@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/O7mt90JaJOyHx7OiBX6TrYX9Ebc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:10:31 -0000

Hi Paul,

On 07/07/2022 16:58, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>> Gentle reminder, the poll runs until July 9.
> 
> Can you say how the poll will be used? There was pretty strong push-back after the original announcement, and it's thus unclear how the poll results will be acted on.

It helps us and the WG itself to prioritise WG activities and start a 
regular WG call for adoption of a number of documents.  We will share 
the results of the poll with the WG and how to make an initial selection 
of documents that will be included in the WG call for adoption process. 
  We currently have 6 drafts for which the authors have asked WG 
adoption, but that is too much new work for the WG to work on.

Any feedback on improving the process to prioritise work in the WG is 
welcome.

Best,

-- Benno