IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F46129418 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:50:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tl_luuPApVrR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:50:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE68B129428 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 91565 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2017 18:50:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 7 Feb 2017 18:50:07 -0000
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:49:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20170207184945.10052.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iK7Vt+ZNw8=E-b+w9gGhwB9fZNqHYp2pqKqT__RgcDttQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OAM9Y_JlS-29mDTSF_IIxIX9r2k>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:50:10 -0000

>I don't think I've seen a good argument for NOT doing the above -- why
>(other thabn the sunk time / effort) don't we do two?

I checked with the protocol police who told me that even with their
tasers set to maximum, they can't force people to use the right one.
I really doubt that if we bless both .alt and .lcl (or whatever) that
the people building stuff will use the one we want them to use.

R's,
John

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status