Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 29 September 2016 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B8612B27B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nN3pVzJSc1bL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1281E12B446 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3slH2r2t00zCWM; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:27:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1475159236; bh=kPgJi0tJ68EFCFBAsCjdW3eB0EiOjz7F0kp6hwTvqck=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=bO5USmXyuvCFeHXYbiq911jRW+L8hXWBJEAPK7luazZmOhhtGjFgxRiOiCm9i1ixi /yF33a4hit+y25Cbe8Ml5uY8Xal2ngIg+Kwvi/gDkP4QoVnzRg+7x5DDAUKoAPvrq1 OBwXlmgCQ2zaML3kXXiaEnxaavJfyGMGhpOTNH+w=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G-rtw--cNQUd; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:27:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:27:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [193.111.228.71] (unknown [193.111.228.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B635F3522EC; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:27:14 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca B635F3522EC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1nhUCuMzynKbzQO23Mcu92xuFeA5SAY6KHDiOcw=rW=7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:27:04 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B493661B-B3D7-4912-9C99-38363BC9C7BB@nohats.ca>
References: <CAHw9_i+UVH78URWzk+4x=j9BZiKfX3C+UeFU9vz1OfZ3tPeN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160920133357.hbvtkrg5uwgzu4wh@nic.fr> <CAHw9_iJ-9mMsu30fyEtJd7y7BPDh3BFjiXOK8dE_UynuF65sPg@mail.gmail.com> <20160925110204.GA12227@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1609251232400.22547@bofh.nohats.ca> <20160928212406.GC4192@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <BFAA2528-7310-4D10-99ED-48F8F8DA0B43@nohats.ca> <CAPt1N1nhUCuMzynKbzQO23Mcu92xuFeA5SAY6KHDiOcw=rW=7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OCXs0Jhhz_UiaYQEAHllp-FXkrQ>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:27:22 -0000

On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:21, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> To be clear, while the IESG may have said something about their
> willingness to entertain further uses of the 6761 process, the 6761
> process represents current IETF consensus.   If we don't update it, it
> stands.  

That does contract earlier statements  from dnsop that stated no new 6761 based special names would be considered until we had a new solution.

Paul