IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 25 September 2016 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E08126B6D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvJcT8QHpfRq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7151200DF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l131so123860854lfl.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FUqxouvNttLFB/HiApipDsBFrzbHl0M1QFWq53vVJB8=; b=KFmzj3jl7vdwQACxfrbdUHcO+BzCWfg5iW7jimMtuZY4adhN3o6u447FVna9MX0HD6 3peLQGqvsiATMaGpqgmo3FQKE1a0kFXS2r5v47PRE/tnXWmtze0FObyD9FpZ6iqfft9/ du4+OC7in/G1CEYZujbyKa+KA59YVOGwCtLNa5Awuw2O8WZlxKR7zLKx32370YO8yYcx ckyhWtHdiIzoruQnxezQEgzrG68iKUTWY0KGLyIB2wl7Omr2K3VkZ+KUypGPgr2Kl6DE 2Vii/1YmAkVaXVqt4kbkd4s2lpRV8rjEAdVo5xHC9ItDUZW9aXrdyKJD3A+rLMoxpHVB JQaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FUqxouvNttLFB/HiApipDsBFrzbHl0M1QFWq53vVJB8=; b=mEiIMCPY5qdzU04ZNijp0bT/L0yFNUF4l+DjjuLmL99tjH7UIDaUASzuExPIlpok02 lFYeEq7Z51QVVpCvr8ypljfRXrN2thW+UQDxbIgOaAf4XIf4c91Q9qfXXHVVVgZ8iCtQ xCS0rLBNJoi+2+fu0s8plN9iWl3TTgpJ8c/QyAjKP6iABr5vohXyVCAu8SR7k1WUWnid Zstx/82/y7SU2/TWbsB9xEscRihjnyv+aJmpe40eYakgU6B43vX/NON4Ap8b85yf1+F5 xJXginisXKkTuB75oA9DuTpSGOYlkkvyjuN4wGzVTa+y8A5THe/yX48x9jDIdk07Gt16 53Fg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOOX6fLL6GYW2YUeyGsgTPyjM3HCjN+V5rTHrKNMfknB/3dS7OQxTVIvjGX6Qi4ZTWugMJ/pvzTzZ5wQQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.133.8 with SMTP id h8mr4955165lfd.152.1474820636390; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160925110204.GA12227@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAHw9_i+UVH78URWzk+4x=j9BZiKfX3C+UeFU9vz1OfZ3tPeN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160920133357.hbvtkrg5uwgzu4wh@nic.fr> <CAHw9_iJ-9mMsu30fyEtJd7y7BPDh3BFjiXOK8dE_UynuF65sPg@mail.gmail.com> <20160925110204.GA12227@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:23:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nNBaTkP4054p=7OPMOn4WMA8MS8x=KxBWtffE5dfuYxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fba9e24045c053d577087"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OEtbfOyX6tewtwCPh626_vQKHkQ>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:24:02 -0000

Stephane, have you read draft-tldr-sutld-ps?   I would be curious to know
if you disagree with the specific set of problems enumerated there; I
realize that you don't believe that there is a problem that motivates a
change; my question is, do you agree or disagree that the things described
in the document are problems?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:46:36AM -0400,
>  Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote
>  a message of 115 lines which said:
>
> > We could -- it is entirely possible that this is not a solvable
> > problem -- however, before we can make that determination, and even
> > more importantly, before we can clearly communicate that to the rest
> > of the IETF / IESG / <etc> we need to agree on what the *problem*
> > actually is.
>
> But some people (like me) are not convinced there is a problem. RFC
> 6761 is imperfect (like every RFC) and can be improved, but it works
> (two TLD were registered through it).
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email